Re: PureMessage-like spam gauge?

2006-08-03 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:34:17PM -0500, Chris St. Pierre wrote: > --- Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm.bak 2006-08-03 13:52:55.0 > -0500 > +++ Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm 2006-08-03 14:24:02.0 -0500 [...] > + GAUGE => sub { > + my $arg =

Re: PureMessage-like spam gauge?

2006-08-03 Thread Chris St. Pierre
Once I realized how easy it was to add new header rewrite functions, I just hacked my own in. If anyone's interested, the diff follows. --- Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm.bak 2006-08-03 13:52:55.0 -0500 +++ Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm 2006-08-03 14:24:02.0 -05

PureMessage-like spam gauge?

2006-08-03 Thread Chris St. Pierre
I'm switching to SpamAssassin from PureMessage. One feature I'm used to is the GAUGE, which is used in rewriting headers much the same way as _STARS(*)_. PureMessage differs from SpamAssassin in that it uses a percentage rather than a score for determining if something is spam -- things are 0% to