From: Jonas Eckerman
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:37:11 +0200
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
>> I saw a test
>> message with just the word test in the subject hit DCC once.
> That's really strange, I don't see how DCC would fire on the subject..
> the checksum of the messa
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
I saw a test
message with just the word test in the subject hit DCC once.
That's really strange, I don't see how DCC would fire on the subject..
the checksum of the message must have somehow matched some Spam..
That's perfectly normal. DCC doen't just match spam,
> > > If you get an E-Mail scoring in both Pyzor and DCC, the chances are
> > > very high that the message is Spam. We only deal with around 90,000
> > > incoming delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false
> > > positive from Pyzor or DCC ye
> -Original Message-
> > If you get an E-Mail scoring in both Pyzor and DCC, the chances are
> > very high that the message is Spam. We only deal with around 90,000
> > incoming delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false
> > positive from Pyzor or D
00
> incoming delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false
> positive from Pyzor or DCC yet, and have been using both for some
> years.
That's odd, I get quite a lot of DCC FPs and a few Pyzor FPs on a
relatively small amount of email. They tend to hit on
>> On 21.07.09 19:18, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
>>> Ok, here is my doubt. I know who are Pyzor and DCC, and I really
>>> convinced that a statistic test is a must to detect spam. But my
>>> doubt is next:
>>> - It is good to have both tests or just one?
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 21.07.09 19:18, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Ok, here is my doubt. I know who are Pyzor and DCC, and I really convinced
that a statistic test is a must to detect spam. But my doubt is next:
- It is good to have both tests or just one?
listing in D
On 21.07.09 19:18, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> Ok, here is my doubt. I know who are Pyzor and DCC, and I really convinced
> that a statistic test is a must to detect spam. But my doubt is next:
> - It is good to have both tests or just one?
Both. They work in a different way, either of the
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:42:52 +1200
"Michael Hutchinson" wrote:
> If you get an E-Mail scoring in both Pyzor and DCC, the chances are
> very high that the message is Spam. We only deal with around 90,000
> incoming delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false
> posi
that the message is Spam. We only deal with around 90,000 incoming
> delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false positive from Pyzor
> or DCC yet, and have been using both for some years.
>
> IMHO there is nothing wrong with using both. If you do see FP's it would
> be a surprise, and the first I've heard of it, personally.
>
> Cheers,
> Michael Hutchinson
Thanx,
be good or just
one.
If you get an E-Mail scoring in both Pyzor and DCC, the chances are very
high that the message is Spam. We only deal with around 90,000 incoming
delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false positive from Pyzor
or DCC yet, and have been using both for some years.
IMHO
Bonjour le monde!
Ok, here is my doubt. I know who are Pyzor and DCC, and I really convinced
that a statistic test is a must to detect spam. But my doubt is next:
- It is good to have both tests or just one?
I was thinking, lets have a mail that it is not a SPAM, and a SA with a spam
level of
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Martin Karol Zuziak wrote:
> Have you tried running spamc/spamd in regular tcp/ip mode instead of
> through unix sockets?
No, not yet because using domain sockets should perform better.
I'll try this though, good suggestion!
> Is it spamd that hogs the cpu? Does it hang befo
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 04:41:56PM +0100, Walter Haidinger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Whenever I enable either pyzor or dcc (or both), spamd hangs and spamc
> doesn't return until the spamd process is killed. While running, it tries
> to consume all available CPU time.
>
> In
Hi!
Whenever I enable either pyzor or dcc (or both), spamd hangs and spamc
doesn't return until the spamd process is killed. While running, it tries
to consume all available CPU time.
In short (more details below), here are the debug logs:
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
15 matches
Mail list logo
