Re: R: Age of a domain name - a new test?

2006-11-01 Thread Jeff Chan
On Tuesday, October 31, 2006, 11:24:35 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:28 AM +0100 Giampaolo Tomassoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly registar plugin? Where can I

Re: R: Age of a domain name - a new test?

2006-11-01 Thread John D. Hardin
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Jeff Chan wrote: I haven't really offically released it yet. http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/SURBL_registrar/ FWIW I attemped to speed read John's code in about 2 seconds but could not determine what ti had to do with SURBLs. Maybe John can clarify? The DNS server

Re: R: Age of a domain name - a new test?

2006-10-31 Thread John D. Hardin
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Jeff Chan wrote: On Monday, October 30, 2006, 11:28:39 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly registar plugin? I mean, a brand-new domain from a SFR (Spam-friendly registar) is really bad (scores 5?). A

Re: R: Age of a domain name - a new test?

2006-10-31 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:28 AM +0100 Giampaolo Tomassoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly registar plugin? Where can I find out more about this plugin? I searched the wiki for registrar and it doesn't turn up.

Re: R: Age of a domain name - a new test?

2006-10-31 Thread John D. Hardin
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:28 AM +0100 Giampaolo Tomassoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly registar plugin? Where can I find out more about this plugin? I searched the wiki for

Re: R: R: Age of a domain name - a new test?

2006-10-31 Thread John D. Hardin
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Where can I find out more about this plugin? I searched the wiki for registrar and it doesn't turn up. http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/SURBL_registrar/ It was on an Hardin's message (id [EMAIL PROTECTED]) sent yesterday to this list.

R: Age of a domain name - a new test?

2006-10-30 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
Generally speaking whois queries is a poor way to determine domain age, at least for client applications. The whois infrastructure is simply not designed to support the volume of queries required, even if locally cached. Other problems: 1. Inconsistent record formats 2. Rate limits

Re: R: Age of a domain name - a new test?

2006-10-30 Thread Jeff Chan
On Monday, October 30, 2006, 11:28:39 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly registar plugin? I mean, a brand-new domain from a SFR (Spam-friendly registar) is really bad (scores 5?). A brand-new domain from a non-SFR is not that bad

R: R: Age of a domain name - a new test?

2006-10-30 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
On Monday, October 30, 2006, 11:28:39 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly registar plugin? I mean, a brand-new domain from a SFR (Spam-friendly registar) is really bad (scores 5?). A brand-new domain from a non-SFR is not

R: R: Age of a domain name - a new test?

2006-10-30 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
On Monday, October 30, 2006, 11:28:39 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Ok. Why not combine an age check with Hardin's spam-friendly registar plugin? I mean, a brand-new domain from a SFR (Spam-friendly registar) is really bad (scores 5?). A brand-new domain from a non-SFR is not