R: Sneaky [EMAIL PROTECTED] slipped through

2007-08-20 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
-Messaggio originale- Da: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It was written by Jennifer several years ago. http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/chickenpox.cf Why it isn't in a regular sare rule? Does it behave well with non-english messages? I'm going on memory here,

R: Sneaky [EMAIL PROTECTED] slipped through

2007-08-17 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
-Messaggio originale- Da: SM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] At 13:02 17-08-2007, John Rudd wrote: Hm. This is the first I've heard of the chickenpox rule. Where does it come from? Is it part of SARE? It was written by Jennifer several years ago.

Re: R: Sneaky [EMAIL PROTECTED] slipped through

2007-08-17 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: -Messaggio originale- Da: SM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] At 13:02 17-08-2007, John Rudd wrote: Hm. This is the first I've heard of the chickenpox rule. Where does it come from? Is it part of SARE? It was written by Jennifer

Re: R: Sneaky [EMAIL PROTECTED] slipped through

2007-08-17 Thread John D. Hardin
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/chickenpox.cf Why it isn't in a regular sare rule? Does it behave well with non-english messages? It may. It can also behave badly in the face of HTML email with a style sheet. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ

Re: R: Sneaky [EMAIL PROTECTED] slipped through

2007-08-17 Thread SM
At 13:58 17-08-2007, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Why it isn't in a regular sare rule? Does it behave well with non-english messages? Quoting http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets Chickenpox rules are broken for non-English text, they treat all accented characters as