On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
There is no such thing as 'too big' when it comes to handling the shit storm
of spam that gets spewed out of some organisations, and I'll treat Gmail and
the likes the same as a ma 'n pa run outback country dialup ISP,
On 31/07/2014 11:36, Dave Warren wrote:
There is a difference: Gmail is a very major source of wanted,
legitimate mail. Most may 'n pa run outback country dialup ISPs are
not.
Most mail to most clients are a very major source of wanted mail
Again, playing favourites is plain wrong, and it
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:34:30 +1000
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
This is the exact attitude as to why they wont get off their arses,
because people think they are too big to block. be damned if I care,
I have blocked yahoo and gmail before, and I dare say I'll have to
again
On 2014-07-30 06:12, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:34:30 +1000
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
This is the exact attitude as to why they wont get off their arses,
because people think they are too big to block. be damned if I care,
I have blocked yahoo and gmail
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 09:12 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:34:30 +1000
Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
This is the exact attitude as to why they wont get off their arses,
because people think they are too big to block. be damned if I care,
I have blocked
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 09:06 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
Certainly have done it on employers network before (a public ISP), and
would have no problem doing it again if the need arose.
There is no such thing as 'too big' when it comes to handling the shit
storm of spam that gets spewed out of
On 2014-07-30 16:06, Noel Butler wrote:
Certainly have done it on employers network before (a public ISP), and
would have no problem doing it again if the need arose.
There is no such thing as 'too big' when it comes to handling the shit
storm of spam that gets spewed out of some organisations,
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:21:56 -0400
Dave Pooser dave...@pooserville.com wrote:
We use the invaluement lists managed by Rob McEwen and have been very
happy with them-- been using them for 3-4 years. A lot of blocking
that doesn't overlap with Spamhaus, very few false positives, and
those that
RBLs are a good first line of defense, but unfortunately a lot of spam
originates from servers that RBLs cannot block for political or
practical resons. Think Gmail, Hotmail and Yahoo servers, for
example. You need something extra to have acceptable catch rates, and
the something extra
On Jul 29, 2014, at 12:29 PM, David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:21:56 -0400
Dave Pooser dave...@pooserville.com wrote:
RBLs are a good first line of defense, but unfortunately a lot of spam
originates from servers that RBLs cannot block for political or
On 30/07/2014 04:29, David F. Skoll wrote:
originates from servers that RBLs cannot block for political or
practical resons. Think Gmail, Hotmail and Yahoo servers, for
This is the exact attitude as to why they wont get off their arses,
because people think they are too big to block. be
11 matches
Mail list logo
