Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* "unrun" (was: SA 4.0.0-rc3 meta rule results "undefined")

2022-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Breyha
On 11/10/2022 15:08, Henrik K wrote: This is because __RCVD_IN_DNSWL is not supposed to be a meta. KAM channel overrides it to "disable" the rule. I just posted on the list about that.. Oh, right! Thanks for the pointer. Didn't catch up to this point yet. Greetings, Wolfgang

Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* "unrun" (was: SA 4.0.0-rc3 meta rule results "undefined")

2022-10-11 Thread Henrik K
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 02:36:59PM +0200, Wolfgang Breyha wrote: > On 11/10/2022 13:29, Henrik K wrote: > > You can also need to use -D rules,rules-all to see any "unrun" rules. > > I tried that using "all,rules,rules-all" and I think I found an other > problem with RCVD_IN_DNSWL* rules. > > If

RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* "unrun" (was: SA 4.0.0-rc3 meta rule results "undefined")

2022-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Breyha
On 11/10/2022 13:29, Henrik K wrote: You can also need to use -D rules,rules-all to see any "unrun" rules. I tried that using "all,rules,rules-all" and I think I found an other problem with RCVD_IN_DNSWL* rules. If I run with a testmail I see: # spamassassin -D all,rules,rules-all &1|grep