At 11:41 AM 12/30/2004, Stuart Johnston wrote:
Looks like the old package used /etc/spamassassin for the standard
rules. The new one uses /usr/share/spamassassin.
OUCH!
/etc/spamassassin should never contain the standard rules.. That's where
local.cf, and add-on rules belong!
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 03:39 PM 12/30/2004 +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
# grep RCVD_IN_ORBS *.cf
20_head_tests.cf:header RCVD_IN_ORBS eval:check_rbl('relay',
'orbs.dorkslayers.com.')
20_head_tests.cf:describe RCVD_IN_ORBS Received via a relay in
From: "Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 2004 December, 30, Thursday 06:39
Subject: Re: RCVD_IN_ORBS
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 00:06 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
> If you are on 3.0 and you installed in a clean directory it is impossible
> that this
At 03:39 PM 12/30/2004 +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
# grep RCVD_IN_ORBS *.cf
20_head_tests.cf:header RCVD_IN_ORBS eval:check_rbl('relay',
'orbs.dorkslayers.com.')
20_head_tests.cf:describe RCVD_IN_ORBS Received via a relay in
orbs.dorkslayers.com
50_scores.c
Well, on a not completely clean 2.64 installation I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/share/spamassassin]$ grep RCVD_IN_ORBS *.cf
30_text_it.cf:lang it describe RCVD_IN_ORBS Ricevuto tramite un relay
presente in orbs.dorkslayers.com
30_text_sk.cf:lang sk describe RCVD_IN_ORBS Prijaté
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 03:39:47PM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
> # grep RCVD_IN_ORBS *.cf
> 20_head_tests.cf:header RCVD_IN_ORBS eval:check_rbl('relay',
> 'orbs.dorkslayers.com.')
> 20_head_tests.cf:describe RCVD_IN_ORBS Received via a
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 00:06 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
> If you are on 3.0 and you installed in a clean directory it is impossible
> that this is in the stock rules. So it must be left over in some
> site-specific rules you have somewhere.
# grep RCVD_IN_ORBS *.cf
20_head_tests.
If you are on 3.0 and you installed in a clean directory it is impossible
that this is in the stock rules. So it must be left over in some
site-specific rules you have somewhere.
Running spamassassin -D should show you the paths SA is using to find the
various rule files. You can then look in th
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 01:49 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> What ancient version of SA are you using? RCVD_IN_ORBS hasn't been a part
> of SA in a LONG time. The last version of SA to include this test in
> the ruleset at all was 2.55 (may 2003).
I already heard that on this li
At 06:24 AM 12/30/2004 +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
RCVD_IN_ORBS RBL: Received via a relay in orbs.dorkslayers.com
[66.218.66.58 listed in orbs.dorkslayers.com]
[66.218.66.30 listed in orbs.dorkslayers.com]
[66.94.237.47 listed in
Hello,
I would like to know if there are some other "open relay list", because
I think the default behaviour of the dorkslayers server is not really
good: it tells
RCVD_IN_ORBS RBL: Received via a relay in orbs.dorkslayers.com
[66.218.66.58 listed in orbs.dorks
11 matches
Mail list logo
