Re: [Bump] No log to syslog after upgrade

2006-09-12 Thread Thomas Ericsson
Sorry I took so long to respond to this. Of course it was me who should RTFM :-P Since we are using CGPSA we are not using SPAMD if I understand it right. From the CGPSA website ( http:// www.tffenterprises.com/cgpsa/ ): "The filter works efficiently, by directly using the SpamAssassin API

RE: [Bump] No log to syslog after upgrade

2006-09-08 Thread Kurt Buff
e.org | Subject: Re: [Bump] No log to syslog after upgrade | | | Kurt Buff wrote: | > I've requested an account, and am waiting for the password. | > | > I understand about command line tools and their use, but SA | is a bit of a | > special case, as it's used as more than

Re: [Bump] No log to syslog after upgrade

2006-09-07 Thread Stuart Johnston
Kurt Buff wrote: I've requested an account, and am waiting for the password. I understand about command line tools and their use, but SA is a bit of a special case, as it's used as more than simply a command line tool - especially when you consider its use with Amavis, etc. amavisd-new has its

RE: [Bump] No log to syslog after upgrade

2006-09-07 Thread Kurt Buff
Entered as # 5093. | -Original Message- | From: Kurt Buff | Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 14:27 | To: users@spamassassin.apache.org | Subject: RE: [Bump] No log to syslog after upgrade | | | I've requested an account, and am waiting for the password. | | I understand

RE: [Bump] No log to syslog after upgrade

2006-09-07 Thread Kurt Buff
al Message- | From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 13:32 | To: users@spamassassin.apache.org | Subject: Re: [Bump] No log to syslog after upgrade | | | On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 01:26:08PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: | > Perhaps an invocation flag c

Re: [Bump] No log to syslog after upgrade

2006-09-07 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 01:26:08PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: > Perhaps an invocation flag could be added? You can feel free to open an enhancement BZ ticket if you like. Generally speaking commandline tools don't log to syslog though. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: If ignorance is bliss, why aren'

RE: [Bump] No log to syslog after upgrade

2006-09-07 Thread Kurt Buff
| From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 09:11:22AM -0700, John D. Hardin wrote: | > > [server]spamassassin --lint -D | > > [22110] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all | > > [22110] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG | > > | > | > Is your syslog daemon configured

Re: [Bump] No log to syslog after upgrade

2006-09-07 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 09:11:22AM -0700, John D. Hardin wrote: > > [server]spamassassin --lint -D > > [22110] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all > > [22110] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG > > > > Is your syslog daemon configured to discard debug-level messages? [...] At last check, spamassa

Re: [Bump] No log to syslog after upgrade

2006-09-07 Thread John D. Hardin
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Thomas Ericsson wrote: > [server]spamassassin --lint -D > [22110] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all > [22110] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG > Is your syslog daemon configured to discard debug-level messages? Are the messages being logged to /var/log/message (or whateve