On Monday 16 May 2005 12:15, Ronan McGlue typed:
> I too have all net tests enabled and have started from a fresh clean new
> database friday, and already Im seeing the german spams hit bayes_00...
> I dont want to switch autolearning off becuase well i find it incredibly
> usefull. i have spam/ha
Simon Byrnand wrote:
At 09:53 16/05/2005, Jo wrote:
Simon Byrnand wrote:
Hi All,
After going from 2.64 to 3.0.3 I thought Bayes was working much
better - previously certain classes of spam were being consistently
reported as ham, scoring BAYES_00 no matter what I did, or how much
manual training
At 09:53 16/05/2005, Jo wrote:
Simon Byrnand wrote:
Hi All,
After going from 2.64 to 3.0.3 I thought Bayes was working much better -
previously certain classes of spam were being consistently reported as
ham, scoring BAYES_00 no matter what I did, or how much manual training I
did. (Autolearning
Simon Byrnand wrote:
Hi All,
After going from 2.64 to 3.0.3 I thought Bayes was working much better
- previously certain classes of spam were being consistently reported
as ham, scoring BAYES_00 no matter what I did, or how much manual
training I did. (Autolearning enabled)
After upgrading to 3
On 4/14/05, J Thomas Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having one heck of a time getting Bayes working with SpamAssassin.
>
> I am using postfix 2.2.2 and SA 3.00.2. Postfix is being ran as the user
> postfix. SA is being ran as postdrop.
>
> The following is the output from the syslog.
[clipped for brevity]...
The source of your problem is indicated by
> spamd[22065]: debug: bayes: Not available for scanning, only 35 ham(s) in
Bayes DB < 200
To use Bayes with SA, you need a minimum of 200 HAM and SPAM messages
learned into the db.
Hope this helps.
-Joe K.
