Re: Bayes improvement

2010-03-25 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 25.3.2010 10:14, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > Having this in the bayes db: > > 335424 nspam > 144915 nham > 129892 ntokens > > and a fairly good hit rate by Bayes in detecting both spam and ham, how > would you improve Bayes scores? > > In example, would you increase every b

RE: Bayes improvement

2010-03-25 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> I have increased BAYES_00 and BAYES_99. It seems that those are pretty > good and cause no FP's, but BAYES_05 may sometimes be spam. I have > BAYES_99 as a killer, it has 5 points, sending the mail to a 'probable > spam' alone. Ah, that is even narrower and probably less prone to misclassificati

Re: Bayes improvement

2010-03-25 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 25.3.2010 20:30, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: >> I have increased BAYES_00 and BAYES_99. It seems that those are pretty >> good and cause no FP's, but BAYES_05 may sometimes be spam. I have >> BAYES_99 as a killer, it has 5 points, sending the mail to a 'probable >> spam' alone. > > Ah, that is e