Logan Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gregory T Pelle wrote:
> > Loren Wilton wrote:
> > > > I could be wrong on this as i am not much of a regex expert,
> > > > but it doesnt appear that this rule will trigger on normal
> > > > things like "Dear Jim"
> > > >
> > > > body DEAR_SOMETHING
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gregory T Pelle wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
I could be wrong on this as i am not much of a regex expert, but it doesnt
appear that this rule will trigger on normal things like "Dear Jim"
body DEAR_SOMETHING /\bDear
(?:IT\W|Internet|candidate|sirs?|madam|investor
Loren Wilton wrote:
I could be wrong on this as i am not much of a regex expert, but it
doesnt appear that this rule will trigger on normal things like "Dear
Jim"
body DEAR_SOMETHING /\bDear
(?:IT\W|Internet|candidate|sirs?|madam|investor|travell?er|car
shopper|web)\b/i
describe
I could be wrong on this as i am not much of a regex expert, but it doesnt
appear that this rule will trigger on normal things like "Dear Jim"
body DEAR_SOMETHING /\bDear
(?:IT\W|Internet|candidate|sirs?|madam|investor|travell?er|car
shopper|web)\b/i
describe DEAR_SOMETHING
Gregory T Pelle wrote:
What is the procedure to have a rule score reviewed?
I have been looking over the scoring for version 3.1.x at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html
and think that a score of 1.6 is high for the DEAR_SOMETHING rule. I
know that our customer support emails
* Gregory T Pelle wrote (09/08/06 15:14):
> What is the procedure to have a rule score reviewed?
>
> I have been looking over the scoring for version 3.1.x at
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html
>
> and think that a score of 1.6 is high for the DEAR_SOMETHING rule. I
> kno
