Thomas Booms wrote on Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:29:35 +0200:
> Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 2.0 required)
Your problem is this setting. You should know by now from following the
list that this is stupid. So, why do you do that and then ask for help?
Set your spam threshold correctly and y
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.2 required=2.0
tests=HTML_BACKHAIR_8,HTML_MESSAGE,
> HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=3.0.4
The easiest way to eliminate this FP would be to take your spam threshold
back to 5, or at least something close to that. The rules that hit on this
ma
* Loren Wilton wrote (07/15/05 12:02):
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=2.2 required=2.0
> tests=HTML_BACKHAIR_8,HTML_MESSAGE,
>> HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=3.0.4
>
> The easiest way to eliminate this FP would be to take your spam threshold
> back to 5, or at least someth
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Thomas Booms wrote on Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:29:35 +0200:
>
>> Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 2.0 required)
>
> Your problem is this setting. You should know by now from
> following the list that this is stupid. So, why do you do that and
> then ask for help? Set your
Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote on Fri, 15 Jul 2005 13:13:19 +0200:
> because
> their mail looks needlessly spammish.
Not from their point of view. It's an advertisement with some
"value-added" stuff (the weather foreacast).
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Int
There was a mistake in my pasting of the whitelist entries. These are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas
--
Booms EDV
- hosting & more -
Herrenstrasse 10
D-59073 Hamm
www.booms-edv.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
