> -Original Message-
> From: List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 9:57 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; Matt Kettler
> Subject: Re: How can I test SURBL is working
>
> > This message should fire them off
> >
> > http:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 12:33:34PM +0800, List wrote:
> Tried without -L . It yes and i works. Does that means i have to change
> from /usr/bin/spamd -L -x -u vpopmail to /usr/bin/spamd -x -u vpopmail ?
If you want network tests, such as SURBL, to be enabled, yes.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline
So you want to run without network checks (-L) to find out if a network
test
will return a hit?
Tried without -L . It yes and i works. Does that means i have to change from
/usr/bin/spamd -L -x -u vpopmail to /usr/bin/spamd -x -u vpopmail ?
Content preview: http://surbl-org-permanent-tes
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:56:49AM +0800, List wrote:
> Saved it to testsurbl. Did a spamassassin -D -L < testsurbl and the result
[...]
> Any insight?
So you want to run without network checks (-L) to find out if a network test
will return a hit?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Minix is one o
This message should fire them off
http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com
I create a text with the following
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20])
by mail.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3
This message should fire them off
http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com
At 10:20 PM 11/20/2005, List wrote:
Hi,
I have
1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -q caching-nameserver
caching-nameserver-7.3-3
2) Net::DNS is up to date.
3) /usr/bin/perl -T -w /usr/bin/spa
