On 22.09.10 13:05, Randal, Phil wrote:
Since a rule update on or around September 21st, we've been getting lots
of hits of INVALID_MSGID.
Investigation reveals nothing wrong with the Message-ID in the vast
majority of cases.
Can anyone shed any light on this?
no, unless you provide some
On 9/22/10 8:05 AM, Randal, Phil wrote:
Since a rule update on or around September 21^st , we’ve been getting
lots of hits of INVALID_MSGID.
Investigation reveals nothing wrong with the Message-ID in the vast
majority of cases.
Can anyone shed any light on this?
Sure. Give me the root
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: INVALID_MSGID hitting valid emails
On 9/22/10 8:05 AM, Randal, Phil wrote:
Since a rule update on or around September 21^st , we've been getting
lots of hits of INVALID_MSGID.
Investigation reveals nothing wrong with the Message-ID in the vast
On ons 22 sep 2010 14:05:56 CEST, Randal, Phil wrote
Since a rule update on or around September 21st, we've been getting lots
of hits of INVALID_MSGID.
Investigation reveals nothing wrong with the Message-ID in the vast
majority of cases.
show a sample, no one here have crystall balls
Can
On ons 22 sep 2010 17:07:46 CEST, John Hardin wrote
can you reduce your sig ?
Probably not if he's posting from a commercial or government account.
road to hell is filled with bad excuseses :)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
