On Freitag, 17. März 2006 00:25 Mathias Homann wrote:
> One day, i get a ticket in our ticket system, which sums up as "we
> need to have spf records, and we need them now, because that guy at
> $SOMEOTHERCOMPANY says so, so that our newsletter is less likely to
> get flagged as spam."
>
> When you
From: "Mathias Homann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
bye,
MH
yes, i DO know that this list is NOT the scary evil monastery. but it
fits into the discussion... sort of...
Um, er, , , aren't monasteries
for "boys"? I better get outa here FAST before someone notices.
>{
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 16. März 2006 17:15 Stewart, John wrote:
>> Aye; thanks. Unfortunately, our current external DNS server doesn't
>> yet support SPF records. =(
>
> SPF is setup just via TXT records, what DNS software doesn't su
Am Donnerstag, 16. März 2006 23:46 schrieb Michael Monnerie:
> On Donnerstag, 16. März 2006 17:15 Stewart, John wrote:
> > Aye; thanks. Unfortunately, our current external DNS server
> > doesn't yet support SPF records. =(
let me rant a bit about SPF records.
Background info: my day job is fondl
On Donnerstag, 16. März 2006 17:15 Stewart, John wrote:
> Aye; thanks. Unfortunately, our current external DNS server doesn't
> yet support SPF records. =(
SPF is setup just via TXT records, what DNS software doesn't support
that?
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc --- it-management Mic
Stewart, John wrote:
>> On Donnerstag, 16. März 2006 08:16 David B Funk wrote:
>>> No, but in the SPF record for "artesyncp.com" you should list the
>>> names of the outgoing SMTP servers so SA (and the world) will know
>>> that they are 'permitted' to source mail for "artesyncp.com".
>
> Aye; tha
> On Donnerstag, 16. März 2006 08:16 David B Funk wrote:
> > No, but in the SPF record for "artesyncp.com" you should list the
> > names of the outgoing SMTP servers so SA (and the world) will know
> > that they are 'permitted' to source mail for "artesyncp.com".
Aye; thanks. Unfortunately, our
On Donnerstag, 16. März 2006 08:16 David B Funk wrote:
> No, but in the SPF record for "artesyncp.com" you should list the
> names of the outgoing SMTP servers so SA (and the world) will know
> that they are 'permitted' to source mail for "artesyncp.com".
You can look at http://openspf.org there's
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Stewart, John wrote:
> Also, and this is perhaps a bigger issue, if we were to set up a seperate
> SMTP server for only outgoing mail (and not incoming), would it be an issue
> if this outgoing SMTP server is not in the MX records for the artesyncp.com
> domain.
>
> So, for ex
Stewart, John a écrit :
> We've got an outgoing SMTP gateway of bratwurst.heurikon.com (heurikon.com
> being an old domain name, and I've never bothered with trying to update the
> domain for all of our infrastructure machines), but our outgoing domain on
> our emails is artesyncp.com (and that may
It shouldn't be a problem as long as the outgoing SMTP host has a valid
domain name and the machine name also resolves. So if the machine name
is blah.yourdomain.com you should still have an "A" record for it in
your DNS. Without it many mail applications will reject the email at
the MTA level (I
11 matches
Mail list logo
