On Friday 14 July 2017 at 15:29:38, Charles Amstutz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I keep having spam come through that hits on almost zero rules, (or very
> few) . I get this is definitely possibly, but it's annoying as its
> obviously spam. I guess my question is, if what we have in place isn't
>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Low scoring spam
At 11:59 AM 2/24/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spamd is aliases to spamassassin.
Ok... May I ask why?
(I excluded the rest of the headers for privacy reasons, but its just the top
part of a regular email
, February 24, 2005 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Low scoring spam
At 11:59 AM 2/24/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spamd is aliases to spamassassin.
Ok... May I ask why?
Hmm.. I wonder if it is even using the bayes db at all. I keep seeing it
find it but I dont see it actually being used. If that is the case how do I
make sure Bayes will be used for each message?
Thanks
Robert
From your logs.
debug: bayes: Not available for scanning, only 48 ham(s) in
Message-
From: Ken Goods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 5:43 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Low scoring spam
Hmm.. I wonder if it is even using the bayes db at all. I keep seeing it
find it but I dont see it actually being used. If that is the case
@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Low scoring spam
Hmm.. I wonder if it is even using the bayes db at all. I keep seeing it
find it but I dont see it actually being used. If that is the case how do I
make sure Bayes will be used for each message?
Thanks
Robert
From your logs.
debug: bayes
PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Low scoring spam
Hmm.. I wonder if it is even using the bayes db at all. I keep seeing it
find it but I dont see it actually being used. If that is the case how do I
make sure Bayes will be used for each message?
Thanks
Robert
From your logs
Without seeing the actual spam it is hard to say how high it could score.
However, getting enough ham into Bayes such that it will run will up the
score considerably.
Loren
Hmm.. I wonder if it is even using the bayes db at all. I keep seeing it
It isn't.
find it but I dont see it actually being used. If that is the case how do
I
make sure Bayes will be used for each message?
debug: bayes: Not available for scanning, only 48 ham(s) in Bayes DB 200
Make sure
Robert Bartlett wrote:
Ok Im sorry I mis understood. I ran it the way you suggested and it did come
with headers this time. I attached the results. I still feel like something
else is wrong.
Install Razor.
Now that I got bayes working my next question is should I reactivate
autowhitelist and autolearn?
Thanks
Robert
]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Low scoring spam
At 10:31 AM 2/23/2005, Robert Bartlett wrote:
Do you suggest until resolved disable this? If to disable it what exactly
do
I need to disable?
Upon closer inspection are you
Hello Robert,
Not directly related to your problem, I don't think, but from your
debug listing I see you're using the following rules files:
debug: config: read file ...
debug: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_random.cf
...
debug: config: read file
At 08:06 PM 2/23/2005, Robert Bartlett wrote:
Well all I did was run spamd -D /path/to/message
Is that a typo of spamc, or did you really try to feed a message to spamd?
At 08:06 PM 2/23/2005, Robert Bartlett wrote:
Well all I did was run spamd -D /path/to/message
Wait.. even if it is a typo, it still won't work.
You need to redirect things when calling spamc.. You can't pass it a filename.
And spamc doesn't take a -D parameter, only spamd does... but spamd does
spamd is aliases to spamassassin. I forgot to insert the part in my
email but that is what I did.
Robert
At 08:06 PM 2/23/2005, Robert Bartlett wrote:
Well all I did was run spamd -D /path/to/message
Wait.. even if it is a typo, it still won't work.
You need to redirect things when
At 11:59 AM 2/24/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spamd is aliases to spamassassin.
Ok... May I ask why?
At 10:09 AM 2/23/2005, Robert Bartlett wrote:
I have one client who gets 15-20 spam emails a day. Currently Im using SA
3.0.1. I had auto whitelist and auto learn on and since turned this off. I
ran spamd -D on one of the emails that got through that should of been
marked spam.
From your log:
: Low scoring spam
At 10:09 AM 2/23/2005, Robert Bartlett wrote:
I have one client who gets 15-20 spam emails a day. Currently Im using SA
3.0.1. I had auto whitelist and auto learn on and since turned this off. I
ran spamd -D on one of the emails that got through that should of been
marked spam
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 8:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Low scoring spam
At 10:09 AM 2/23/2005, Robert Bartlett wrote:
I have one client who gets 15-20 spam emails a day. Currently Im
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 8:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Matt Kettler'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Low scoring spam
Robert
set the score to zero in local.cf
score ALL_TRUSTED 0
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865
At 10:31 AM 2/23/2005, Robert Bartlett wrote:
Do you suggest until resolved disable this? If to disable it what exactly do
I need to disable?
Upon closer inspection are you sure you fed SA the actual message with
complete headers?
Are you sure that's not the output of spamassasin --lint??
It
|-Original Message-
|From: alan premselaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: 04 December 2004 15:23
|To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
|Subject: low scoring SPAM
|
|I've recently (about a month ago) installed a new mail server and
|upgraded to SA 3.01. I've been training the bayes
I've recently (about a month ago) installed a new mail server and
upgraded to SA 3.01. I've been training the bayes database by hand
(most of our mail is japanese and the autolearning wasn't a good way to
start the bayes learning)
anyways, I'm not using any custom or 3rd party
Well, first off I'd send a note to Geocities letting them know they are
being used as a spam host. That may not appreciate that, and take
appropriate action.
Second I'd look to some of the SARE rules. The OEM rules *might* have added
a point or two to this spam. However, it only mentions a
25 matches
Mail list logo
