On Monday 25 July 2005 01:14 am, Jeff Chan wrote:
Please test sc2 and the revised xs and let us know how they
perform for you. Those with large spam and ham corpora (such as
the SpamAssassin developers) are encouraged to test and please
let us know.
Although I don't have a large amount of
From the last three days:
SpamAssassinRuleHits for SPAM (score 10 and higher):
BAYES_99 ( 95%)
RAZOR2_CHECK ( 90%)
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 ( 85%)
DIGEST_MULTIPLE ( 74%)
URIBL_BLACK ( 72%)
From the last few days:
SURBL Hits
--- ---
URIBL_PH_SURBL3
URIBL_AB_SURBL5,342
URIBL_XS_SURBL3,529
URIBL_JP_SURBL 14,423
URIBL_SC2_SURBL 5,681
URIBL_OB_SURBL 11,742
URIBL_SC_SURBL5,097
URIBL_WS_SURBL9,931
--
Clay
It sure would help to know how may of those hits were on ham vice spam.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: Clay Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the last few days:
SURBL Hits
--- ---
URIBL_PH_SURBL3
URIBL_AB_SURBL5,342
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 04:25:20PM -0700, jdow wrote:
From the last few days:
SURBL Hits
--- ---
URIBL_PH_SURBL3
URIBL_AB_SURBL5,342
URIBL_XS_SURBL3,529
URIBL_JP_SURBL 14,423
URIBL_SC2_SURBL 5,681
URIBL_OB_SURBL 11,742
On Thursday, July 28, 2005, 12:29:49 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
I added them yesterday, and I've had no hits. I am hitting other SURBLs:
URIBL_AB_SURBL 1,345 times
URIBL_OB_SURBL 2,982 times
URIBL_SC_SURBL 2,564 times
URIBL_WS_SURBL 1,111 times
You dont use URIBL_JP_SURBL
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:58:30PM -0700, jdow wrote:
I added them yesterday, and I've had no hits. I am hitting other SURBLs:
Did you restart spamd?
Yes. My no hits is attributed to bad analysis. :)
XS 2,698 times
JP 12,251 times
XS2 4,733 times
--
Clay Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some stats from one of our SA servers. After about two days we
had:
9076 SURBL hits
5373 SC2 hits
4813 SC hits
1148 SC2 hits that did not also hit SC
588 SC hits that did not also hit SC2
3701 XS hits
1890 SC2 hits that did not hit XS
218 XS hits that did not hit SC2
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:13:38PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
That will work, but it's technically incorrect since the
standalone lists sc2 and xs aren't bitmask-encoded, which is what
urirhssub is intended for. Standalone lists should be used with
urirhsbl, so correct, working rules for these
From: Clay Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I added them yesterday, and I've had no hits. I am hitting other SURBLs:
Did you restart spamd?
{^_^}
From: Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this correct as ammended? I added the TXT strings
Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two lists:
urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. TXT
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe
On Monday, July 25, 2005, 12:33:08 AM, jdow jdow wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this correct as ammended? I added the TXT strings
Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two lists:
Please try:
urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. A127.0.0.2
body
jdow wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this correct as ammended? I added the TXT strings
Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two lists:
urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. TXT
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
OK the prior rules were still wrong. These will work:
urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. A
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe URIBL_SC2_SURBL Has URI in SC2 at http://www.surbl.org/lists.html
tflagsURIBL_SC2_SURBL net
score
From: Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday, July 25, 2005, 12:33:08 AM, jdow jdow wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this correct as ammended? I added the TXT strings
Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two
lists:
Please try:
urirhsbl
jdow wrote:
From: "Jeff Chan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using these two lists:
urirhsbl URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org.
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe URIBL_SC2_SURBL Has URI in SC2 at
On Monday, July 25, 2005, 12:06:10 PM, jdow jdow wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday, July 25, 2005, 12:33:08 AM, jdow jdow wrote:
From: Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this correct as ammended? I added the TXT strings
Here are SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and later configs for using
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2005, 3:11:40 PM, Tim Litwiller wrote:
this is what it took to make it work for me
_urirhssub_ URIBL_SC2_SURBL sc2.surbl.org. A127.0.0.2
body URIBL_SC2_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SC2_SURBL')
describe URIBL_SC2_SURBL Has
18 matches
Mail list logo
