Re: Stock/image-only spam still getting through

2006-07-18 Thread Andy Jezierski
Owen Mehegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/17/2006 05:20:44 PM: > I've been inundated with maddening image-only stock spam lately. > I've just today sat down to try and tweak my rules up to weed this > out. I added sare_stocks and sare_obfu, updated my version of rules > du jour for good mea

RE: Stock/image-only spam still getting through

2006-07-18 Thread Bowie Bailey
Loren Wilton wrote: > > I've attached the one that just got through. spamassassin -t > > reports the following for it: > > > > 0.8 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous > > Content-type:...type= entry > > 2.9 HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname > >

Re: Stock/image-only spam still getting through

2006-07-17 Thread Loren Wilton
I've attached the one that just got through. spamassassin -t reports the following for it: 0.8 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry 2.9 HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (Split IP) 1.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO

Re: Stock/image-only spam still getting through

2006-07-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:20:44PM -0400, Owen Mehegan wrote: > The highest scores are for the HELO? We've got to be able to do better than > that... what am I missing? sa-update? with just local rules: [19640] dbg: check: is spam? score=16.082 required=5 [19640] dbg: check: tests=BAYES_99,EXTR