Re: Support - spamassassin

2007-08-31 Thread Duane Hill
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 at 10:38 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: We have been running our service for almost 5 years and this problem started with this ISP client of yours (TELEBEC) last week after they upgraded their servers to the latest version of SPAMASSASSIN I'm told. We are now be

RE: Support - spamassassin

2007-08-31 Thread Tony Le Piane
don't get it. Really appreciate your reply. Best Regards, Tony -Original Message- From: Duane Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 31, 2007 11:07 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Support - spamassassin On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 at 10:38 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] co

RE: Support - spamassassin

2007-08-31 Thread SM
At 08:15 31-08-2007, Tony Le Piane wrote: That was a typo when I copied .. its actually -0400 I have compared it to other SMTP headers and don't see any differences. Also looked at RFC 2822 and we comply. This is the INVALID_DATE rule: Date !~ /^\s*(?:(?i:Mon|Tue|Wed|Thu|Fri|Sat|Sun),\s)?\s*