Re: URIBL False positive

2005-12-06 Thread Matt Kettler
Brian Leyton wrote: > I'm relatively new to SpamAssassin, but I've managed to get it working well > in conjunction with MimeDefang. I'm having a strange problem though, which > I hope someone can help me figure out. > > I'm on a hobby mailing list, and occasionally emails to this list are being >

Re: URIBL False positive

2005-12-07 Thread Jeff Chan
On Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 1:26:32 PM, Brian Leyton wrote: > I'm relatively new to SpamAssassin, but I've managed to get it working well > in conjunction with MimeDefang. I'm having a strange problem though, which > I hope someone can help me figure out. > I'm on a hobby mailing list, and occa

RE: URIBL False positive

2005-12-07 Thread Brian Leyton
Jeff Chan wrote: > What version of SpamAssassin are you using? There is a bug > in 3.0.x that can cause intermittent errors like this. "Spamassassin -V" reports: SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 running on Perl version 5.8.6 Brian Leyton IT Manager Commercial Petroleum Equipment

Re: URIBL False positive

2005-12-07 Thread Jeff Chan
On Wednesday, December 7, 2005, 8:14:43 AM, Brian Leyton wrote: > Jeff Chan wrote: >> What version of SpamAssassin are you using? There is a bug >> in 3.0.x that can cause intermittent errors like this. > "Spamassassin -V" reports: > SpamAssassin version 3.0.4 > running on Perl version 5.8.6

RE: URIBL False positive

2005-12-07 Thread Brian Leyton
Jeff Chan wrote: > > OK I can't remember if that one has the bug fix or not. 3.1 > definitely does. > > What was the specific FP domain? Here's the scoring section of the SA report: Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description --

Re: URIBL False positive

2005-12-07 Thread Jeff Chan
On Wednesday, December 7, 2005, 8:31:06 AM, Brian Leyton wrote: > Jeff Chan wrote: >> >> OK I can't remember if that one has the bug fix or not. 3.1 >> definitely does. >> >> What was the specific FP domain? > Here's the scoring section of the SA report: > Content analysis details: (5.5 poi

RE: URIBL False positive

2005-12-07 Thread Brian Leyton
Jeff Chan wrote: > Thanks. americanbroadcastdx.com was never on any SURBLs, so > it's probably the bug. Please consider upgrading to 3.1 or > possibly even 3.0.5 as this may fix the bug: > > http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3997 > > The developers will know for sure a