>>
>> >>> that the spammers are sending many small images inline with the e-mails!
>> >>> But, I have yet to see a way
>> >>> to filter against this. Any thoughts?
>>
>> Content-Type: text/html;
>> charset="windows-1252"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>
>> if properly
>>> that the spammers are sending many small images inline with the e-mails!
>>> But, I have yet to see a way
>>> to filter against this. Any thoughts?
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
if properly encoded html is in place why e
> I am seeing this too. It's the only spam I get now. Stocks with GIF
> images inline.
> How annoying. I bumped up SARE_GIF_ATTACH to 4.75 points but
> that's not enough to kill it.
> Anyone have a good rule for this??
Well, after some digging the lowest score I found for these was
Content a
On Freitag, 16. Juni 2006 17:33 Toll, Eric wrote:
> Anyone have a good rule for this??
I didn't have a single message of this type passing my filters. That
surprised me, positively. Here's what they got:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=20.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=BAYES_99=3.5, EXTRA_MPAR
> -Original Message-
> From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Matt wrote:
>
> > It seems the spammers have gotten smart to the fact that we were
> > filtering for one large image and no text... now what I am
> seeing is
> > that the spammers are sending
From: "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Matt wrote:
It seems the spammers have gotten smart to the fact that we were
filtering for one large image and no text... now what I am seeing
is that the spammers are sending many small images inline with the
e-mails! But, I hav
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Matt wrote:
> It seems the spammers have gotten smart to the fact that we were
> filtering for one large image and no text... now what I am seeing
> is that the spammers are sending many small images inline with the
> e-mails! But, I have yet to see a way to filter against th
