> V V wrote:
> >My e-mail provider has SpamAssasin-3.2.1 installed.
> >But it ranks many spam messages very differently than my SpamAssasin-3.2.4
> >on my computer.
> >
> >For example message below is ranked score=2.2 by SpamAssassin-3.2.1 on my
> >provider with failing tests=RCVD_BAD_ID,RDNS_NON
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 at 18:14 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
by dgw218.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl with smtp (Exim 4.62
We've been blocking adsl.tpnet.pl for over a year yet they still barrage
our servers daily with bot-infested clients. Some sites block the whole
.PL tld, but that's
On Monday 24 March 2008 23:14:48 James E. Pratt wrote:
>. Some sites block the whole .PL tld, but that's a bit evil IMO.
I know a big corp who blocks the entire .org. worst part is that the bounces
go to the receiver instead the sender. "you got an email from your developer
contact , but you're
> > by dgw218.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl with smtp (Exim 4.62
We've been blocking adsl.tpnet.pl for over a year yet they still barrage
our servers daily with bot-infested clients. Some sites block the whole
.PL tld, but that's a bit evil IMO.
V V wrote:
My e-mail provider has SpamAssasin-3.2.1 installed.
But it ranks many spam messages very differently than my SpamAssasin-3.2.4 on
my computer.
For example message below is ranked score=2.2 by SpamAssassin-3.2.1 on my
provider with failing tests=RCVD_BAD_ID,RDNS_NONE.
And the same m
>From what I see... it looks like perhaps your provider is doing only
local tests from within SpamAssassin (the RDNS_NONE is from the MTA
reporting no RNDS for that IP).
You, on the other hand, seem to be running networks tests + Razor.
- Jason J Ellingson
Fro
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:24:38PM -0700, V V wrote:
> For example message below is ranked score=2.2 by SpamAssassin-3.2.1 on my
> provider with failing tests=RCVD_BAD_ID,RDNS_NONE.
>
> And the same message is ranked score=15.007 by SpamAssassin-3.2.4 on my
> computer with failing
> tests=RAZOR
