As you want a site-wide Bayes, you also need the bayes_path
parameter. What setting do you have for bayes_path (note it
isn't a simple directory name).
bayes_path /usr/spamassassin/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0777
OK, is the directory /usr/spamassassin writable by the user-ID that
you are
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:34:49 -0500 (CDT)
David B Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
Raquel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the
server keeps getting
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 01:22:15 -0500 (CDT)
Dave Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
bayes_path /usr/spamassassin/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0777
OK, is the directory /usr/spamassassin writable by the user-ID
that you are running spamd as? What happens if you do a:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 01:22:15 -0500 (CDT)
Dave Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
bayes_path /usr/spamassassin/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0777
OK, is the directory /usr/spamassassin writable by the user-ID
that you are running spamd as? What happens if you do a:
In Sendmail configuration I have:
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin',
`S=local:/var/run/sendmail/spamass.sock,
F=,T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m')dnl
Then in /etc/defaults/spamass-milter:
OPTIONS=-u spamassassin -i 127.0.0.1
Maybe a dumb question: did you restart spamass-milter after
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:44:35 -0700
Raquel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:39:40 -0700
Raquel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
Raquel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the
server keeps getting
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
Raquel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
keeps getting autolearn=failed. I don't seem to be able to
figure out is causing that.
--
Raquel
I should say
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:34:49 -0500 (CDT)
David B Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
Raquel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the
server keeps getting autolearn=failed. I don't
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
Raquel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
keeps getting autolearn=failed. I don't seem to be able to
figure out is causing that.
--
Raquel
I should say that this server is Debian Etch
Raquel wrote:
I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
keeps getting autolearn=failed. I don't seem to be able to figure
out is causing that.
Generally speaking, that means SpamAssassin can't write to the bayes
database.
The most common cause of this is a spamd
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:39:40 -0700
Raquel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
Raquel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
keeps getting autolearn=failed. I don't seem to be able to
figure out is causing that.
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:40:44 -0400
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raquel wrote:
I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
keeps getting autolearn=failed. I don't seem to be able to
figure out is causing that.
Generally speaking, that means
Raquel wrote:
I created a new user spamassassin, with a password. I call
spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still getting
autolearn=failed.
Interesting.. Could you detail how you called spamassassin-milter using
that new user?
Raquel wrote:
I created a new user spamassassin, with a password. I call
spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still getting
autolearn=failed.
Wait.. Do you actually have the optional DB_File perl module installed?
(required to support bayes unless you set it up using SQL)
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:30:16 -0400
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raquel wrote:
I created a new user spamassassin, with a password. I call
spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still
getting autolearn=failed.
Interesting.. Could you detail how you called
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:34:01 -0400
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raquel wrote:
I created a new user spamassassin, with a password. I call
spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still
getting autolearn=failed.
Wait.. Do you actually have the optional DB_File
Raquel wrote:
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:30:16 -0400
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raquel wrote:
I created a new user spamassassin, with a password. I call
spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still getting
autolearn=failed.
Interesting.. Could you detail how
Raquel wrote:
I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
keeps getting autolearn=failed. I don't seem to be able to figure
out is causing that.
Run a message that hasn't been learned through spamassassin manually as
the user who you normally scan as (ie. 'spamassassin'
Dennis Clark wrote:
Using FC5, SA 3.1.0, calling SA with spampd.
Every message that meets the autolearn threshold (spaminess~30
1) results in an autolearn=failed result. Checked permissions and made
sure bayesian and whitelist were r/w for user mail. Log shows locking
errors on
Steven Manross wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0
tests=AWL=0.023,BAYES_00=-2.599
autolearn=failed version=3.1.1
It seems that since upgrading to 3.11 last night, the
autolearn=yes|no|failed always shows up as failed (on all messages).
Did I miss something?
Generally
-Original Message-
From: Steven Manross
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 12:46 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: autolearn=failed after upgrade to 3.11
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0
tests=AWL=0.023,BAYES_00=-2.599
autolearn=failed version=3.1.1
It
Steven Manross wrote:
It looks like the autolearn is working now.
Does anyone have any ideas on the misplaced headers? Or is that a new
de facto standard?
You mean this:
As well, the headers added by SA (and me [through SA] for MsgID) are now
showing at the top of the headers from the
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:35 PM
To: Steven Manross
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: autolearn=failed after upgrade to 3.11
Steven Manross wrote:
It looks like the autolearn is working now
It seems that since upgrading to 3.11 last night, the
autolearn=yes|no|failed always shows up as failed (on all messages).
Did I miss something?
Generally Failed means that SA somehow can't access the
bayes database to write to it.
Have you tried sa-learn --sync and then
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While referring the previous discussions regarding permissions on
Bayes DB files, I would like to know what should be the permissions
because the log files indicate
autolearn=failed/no
Well no merely indicates that the message did not score high or low
enough to
File-permission issue?
From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 6:21 PMTo:
users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject:
autolearn=failed
When I receive spam msgs I have this line in
headers autolearn=failed .I tried to look it on wiki but I
Michael wrote:
When I receive spam msgs I have this line in headers autolearn=failed .I
tried to look it on wiki but I couldn't find anything. I know it that
the SA cannot gain lock on bayes database. I checked maillog file but I
couldn't find anything that was suspicious. Anybody could help
Don Levey wrote:
Please forgive me if this is in the archives; I'm having trouble
finding it.
I've just finished training my Bayes DB using sa-learn (perversely,
when I was trying to collect 200 spam messages, the spammers decided
to stop sending to me). Now that the DB is usable, it's
You're not alone Don ! hehe...
I was waiting for replies after your first post. Now with this one, I should
be able to make some sense of this autolearn feature within my setup.
Already something is clearer (clear as mud), since I'm trashing msgs with a
score greater than 10, I probably will
Jean Caron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 04/01/2005 10:19:13 AM:
You're not alone Don ! hehe...
I was waiting for replies after your first post. Now with this one,
I should
be able to make some sense of this autolearn feature within my setup.
Already something is clearer (clear as mud),
30 matches
Mail list logo
