Herb Martin learnquick.com> writes:
>
>
> Clarification: .49 is Ok in every report I have seen about
> problems with .50-52 -- it is the recommended retreat position,
> and that (0.49) is working for me after trouble with a later
> version.
>
> > Loren
>
> --
> Herb
>
>
I found
That doesn't turn up anything either. I've got a vanilla, out-of-the-box
set of configs. :\
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > The problem is still happening. I'm willing to downgrade if you think
> > that'll solve the problem.
>
> No, this is probably somethig else. I'd grep your va
I'm running Net::DNS 0.53, which installed cleanly on my system.
I've also cleaned out any errors generated by sa --lint.
The problem is still happening. I'm willing to downgrade if you think
that'll solve the problem.
Thanks,
Chris
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > ul 30 19:13:29
At 07:17 PM 7/30/2005, Chris Martino wrote:
Hello,
I've just upgraded my SA from 2.50 to 3.04, however the new installation
seems to be generating a few errors when checking mail. I'm using SA with
qmail-scanner 1.25 with spamd and spamc. When an email is getting scanned
I get these errors in
> From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > ul 30 19:13:29 rvm spamd[88566]: checking message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0.
> > Jul 30 19:13:29 rvm spamd[88566]: Argument "CHECK" isn't numeric in
> > subroutine entry at
> > /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-freebsd/IO/So
> ul 30 19:13:29 rvm spamd[88566]: checking message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0.
> Jul 30 19:13:29 rvm spamd[88566]: Argument "CHECK" isn't numeric in
> subroutine entry at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-freebsd/IO/Socket/INET.pm
> line 194, line 230.
This is just a guess, but what v
