Hi All... Alain, no need to confirm the message body, it was the compromise
campaign.
iPhone truncated the message; couldn't see the full deal until after I'd sent
my reply.
Thanks all--
Mkr
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 29, 2013, at 10:00 PM, "Margot Romary"
wrote:
> Hi Alain... Apologies f
Hi Alain... Apologies for the delayed reply. I'm mid-move cross country with
my family and have limited access to email.
Living Social, stemming from their recent internal compromise, sent
notifications of the breach to any address from which they'd had a touchpoint
in the past. They hit a *l
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 20:48 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I've pointed out a meta-issue, which is that SA's score adjustment
> algorithm is reasonable for tests where senders and the tests don't have
> a relationship, but IMHO SA should have standards for whitelists that
> accept money to be listed.
Many people have had issues with returnpath. They claim to address
issues, but most of my interactions with them have been unsatisfactory.
I've pointed out a meta-issue, which is that SA's score adjustment
algorithm is reasonable for tests where senders and the tests don't have
a relationship, b
Alain Kelder skrev den 2013-04-27 13:26:
RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED=-3
RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE=-2
meta RP_FAIL_ADJ (RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED && RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE)
score RP_FAIL_ADJ 5
just an example that works for me atleast, when i used dnseval rules
:=)
I've overridden the scores for the above tests in my
On 27.04.13 04:26, Alain Kelder wrote:
Today a spam message from livingsocial.com got through. It was sent
to a honey pot address (e.g. not used for legitimate mail). I don't
even have an account with livingsocial.com. This spam message would
have been caught had SA not credited it -5 points wi
> Hello,
>
> Today a spam message from livingsocial.com got through. It was sent to
> a
> honey pot address (e.g. not used for legitimate mail). I don't even
> have
> an account with livingsocial.com. This spam message would have been
> caught had SA not credited it -5 points with two RP rules:
>
