Re: Another SARE channel with the most used rules available

2006-09-11 Thread Michael Schaap
On 10-Sep-2006 8:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Any chance of adding support for 3.1.5? (Currently fails with "dns: > query failed: 5.1.3.saupdates.openprotect.*com* => NXDOMAIN".) We've already added txt record for the 3.1.5 release and it should work now. Thanks. Indeed, it works fine n

Re: Another SARE channel with the most used rules available

2006-09-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, > gpg --armor --export KEYID > > the man page is amazingly helpful ;-) Thanks, that was helpful. The instructions have been updated to use this technique instead of copying the entire public key ring of root. cheers, skar. -- OpenProtect - The email virus/spam filter http://openprotec

Re: Another SARE channel with the most used rules available

2006-09-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, > Any chance of adding support for 3.1.5? (Currently fails with "dns: > query failed: 5.1.3.saupdates.openprotect.com => NXDOMAIN".) We've already added txt record for the 3.1.5 release and it should work now. cheers, skar. -- OpenProtect - The email virus/spam filter http://openpr

Re: Another SARE channel with the most used rules available

2006-09-06 Thread Michael Schaap
Hi, On 24-Aug-2006 0:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is to notify you about another SARE channel with the most used rules available as a single channel. If you're not the type to try every single rule in SARE and manually select them, you can instead use this single channel instead. (sn

Re: Another SARE channel with the most used rules available

2006-08-24 Thread Vivek Khera
On Aug 24, 2006, at 7:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, downloading the gpg and using "sa-update import" doesn't have that problem though. So, how to extract this public key alone from the public key ring to copy over to the sa-update public key ring? Any idea on this is welcome :) gp

Re: Another SARE channel with the most used rules available

2006-08-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justin Mason wrote: hey, btw, it might be better to extract the gpg public key from "gpg", instead of copying over the entire public key ring -- since that will (a) overwrite any existing SA-update keys, including the system ones, and (b) will trust any existing GPG correspondents to publish SA