On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, Justin Mason wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 01:21:19PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Does this mean we're going to get/need a port in for the IP::Country::Fast
module? I can create it if you like.
(I haven't been able to fin
--On Saturday, September 25, 2004 12:47:20 -0400 David Brodbeck <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
And, just as a note, the latest ExiScan is 27, for Exim 4.42.
Is that in the ports tree yet? I know they've been under a freeze
for a while now.
Yep, that's the current port versions.
-Pat
+-le 25/09/2004 13:21 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin écrivait :
| On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|
| Does this mean we're going to get/need a port in for the IP::Country::Fast
| module? I can create it if you like.
|
| (I haven't been able to find a useful documentation on creating
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Does this mean we're going to get/need a port in for the IP::Country::Fast
module? I can create it if you like.
(I haven't been able to find a useful documentation on creating a port 00
is there one?)
A menu-based config (like the one for the mod_php)
+-le 25/09/2004 02:20 -0700, Pat Lashley écrivait :
| --On Saturday, September 25, 2004 08:59:03 +0200 Mathieu Arnold
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> +-Le 24/09/2004 18:20 -0700, Pat Lashley a dit :
|>| SA 3.0 should probably be a separate port rather than an update
|>| to the existing SA port;
Pat Lashley wrote:
For example, it would break the Exim port which by
default includes the ExiScan patches. (The Exim port would still
build; but the SpamAssassin support would fail at run time.)
Sure about that? I'm running Exim with Exiscan version 22, built from
the port, and it's working fin
--On Saturday, September 25, 2004 08:59:03 +0200 Mathieu Arnold <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
+-Le 24/09/2004 18:20 -0700, Pat Lashley a dit :
| SA 3.0 should probably be a separate port rather than an update
| to the existing SA port; due to the lack of backwards compatability
| in the API. For exa
--On Saturday, September 25, 2004 00:21:44 -0400 David Brodbeck <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
For example, it would break the Exim port which by
default includes the ExiScan patches. (The Exim port would still
build; but the SpamAssassin support would fail at run time.)
Sure about that? I'm running
--On Friday, September 24, 2004 04:37:05 -0400 "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've gotten a Makefile mostly tuned for sa3, based on the
FreeBSD port makefile for 2.64. I've added most of the
dependencies, but FreeBSD doesn't have ports for Net::SMTP
or IP::Country::Fast, s
At 04:37 AM 9.24.2004 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>I've gotten a Makefile mostly tuned for sa3, based on the FreeBSD port
>makefile for 2.64. I've added most of the dependencies, but FreeBSD
>doesn't have ports for Net::SMTP or IP::Country::Fast, so those two
>features can't be auto
10 matches
Mail list logo
