catch these is trivial.
Cheers,
Phil
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Randal, Phil
> Sent: 10 March 2006 17:13
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Latest spammers' trick - email address
>...
>>>...
>>> Thoughts, anyone?
>>
>> Um... SA should already be treating email addresses in the body as
>> URIs... Are you sure yours isn't looking up the offending domains
>> agianst the URIBLs you're using?
>
>I don't believe that's accurate. I know Jeff C. argued that it "wasn't
>what SURB
rch 2006 15:47
> To: Matt Kettler
> Cc: Randal, Phil; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Latest spammers' trick - email address in body
> instead of url
>
> On 10/03/06 10:26 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > Randal, Phil wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
&
6 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: Latest spammers' trick - email address in body instead of url
| Here is one I have;
|
| body only:
| - Original Message -
| From: Brown Lane
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Monday, March 6, 2006 10:15 AM
| Subject: billing
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Not seen any of these yet, any chance of some examples?
| |
| | C.
|
|
Here is one I have;
body only:
- Original Message -
From: Brown Lane
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2006 10:15 AM
Subject: billing
| Not seen any of these yet, any chance of some examples?
|
| C.
On 10/03/06 10:26 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Randal, Phil wrote:
Hi folks,
We're seeing increasing amounts of spam coming in which the email's body
contains seemingly innocuous (but obviously irrelevant) text plus an
email address for more information.
With no urls in the message, uribls are usel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Randal, Phil wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We're seeing increasing amounts of spam coming in which the email's body
> contains seemingly innocuous (but obviously irrelevant) text plus an
> email address for more information.
>
[snip]
Phil,
Not seen any of t
Randal, Phil wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We're seeing increasing amounts of spam coming in which the email's body
> contains seemingly innocuous (but obviously irrelevant) text plus an
> email address for more information.
>
> With no urls in the message, uribls are useless...
>
> Currently we've had sp
