IMHO, 3.x is by far the best and most efficient release to date.
Just follow the doc. It's very easy.
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Polk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Raymond Dijkxhoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11
Hi!
Any caveats to upgrading to 3.x? Any configs I need to check for overwrite?
You should follow the docs, there is much mentioned there. Like upgrading
your bayes databases. If you use those...
You dont happen to have the SURBL plugin installed i guess?
Would be wise to upgrade to SA 3.x or ins
Any caveats to upgrading to 3.x? Any configs I need to check for overwrite?
--
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Joe Polk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:41:28 +0100 (CET)
Hi!
He's on 2.64 currently.
You don't say what version of SA you are referring to. The best
thing is to upgrade to latest SA which does a terrific job using
several URL black lists. This is a new feature in SA that looks for
URLs in spam. This will likely stop your problem without having to
write
He's on 2.64 currently.
--
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:49:36 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Porn Spam
> You don't say what version of SA you are referring to. The best
> thing i
You don't say what version of SA you are referring to. The best thing is
to upgrade to latest SA which does a terrific job using several URL black
lists. This is a new feature in SA that looks for URLs in spam. This will
likely stop your problem without having to write special rules.
> I have a
Jon,
Can you post the rule for this? I would like to see an example.
TIA,
- Original Message -
From: "Jon McGreevy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Joe Polk'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:55 AM
Subject: RE: Porn Spam
On Monday, March 21, 2005, 6:40:54 AM, Joe Polk wrote:
> I have a friend who has seen a rediculous amount of porn spam lately. He is
> setup with SA+clamav-milter+clamd. We have a few rules in place but nothing
> seems to put a dent in the porn spam. I know someone mentioned a new rule
> coming out
I made a few custom rules for SA
I did a rawbody test for /jpg/i
Also another rawbody for /gif/i
And then gave these two point values just above the value of spam like I
have mine set at 8 and gave each of these a 30. The emails that I have been
getting in were just a weblink and some text. My
