On 10/12/2014 9:59 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On 10 Oct 2014, at 06:49 , RW wrote:
And, if not, is it generally better to do sitewide?
It's hard to say, there are advantages and disadvantages either
way.
OK, so specific example then.
Small server with a few dozen email users spread over several
Am 12.10.2014 um 18:59 schrieb LuKreme:
On 10 Oct 2014, at 06:49 , RW wrote:
And, if not, is it generally better to do sitewide?
It's hard to say, there are advantages and disadvantages either way.
OK, so specific example then.
Small server with a few dozen email users spread over several
On 10 Oct 2014, at 06:49 , RW wrote:
>> And, if not, is it generally better to do sitewide?
>
> It's hard to say, there are advantages and disadvantages either way.
OK, so specific example then.
Small server with a few dozen email users spread over several domains. Almost
none of these users d
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, RW wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:26:25 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
Is it possible to have a site-wide bayes AND individual bayes for
some users (or all users)?
Not as things stand.
Not as things stand, possibly absent a hack like: any user who wants to
use the site-wide bayes
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:26:25 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
> Is it possible to have a site-wide bayes AND individual bayes for
> some users (or all users)?
Not as things stand. You could use Bayes for one and a separate filter
for the other.
> And, if not, is it generally better to do sitewide?
It's hard
