On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
[...]
So, we're back to my subject line, sa-update doesn't [Big Grin]
Whose NXDOMAIN error is this?
NXDOMAIN isn't an error (at least not a DNS error), the record simply
does not exist. For some, again unknown, reason (although I've
Gene Heskett wrote on Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:58:52 -0400:
And that stanza about the metadata I posted before is unchanged:
Which I would like to fix.
Gene, it was told to you several times how to fix that. Check for the
rules these meta rules are based on. Check if they exist and check if the
On 8/15/2007 8:58 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
[...]
So, we're back to my subject line, sa-update doesn't [Big Grin]
Whose NXDOMAIN error is this?
NXDOMAIN isn't an error (at least not a DNS error), the record simply
does not exist. For some,
Gene Heskett wrote on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:15:24 -0400:
Ok, is there a quick dirty way to determine which .pre file (or local.cf,
there are 3 of those too) is actually running the show?
all the files in /etc/mail/spamassassin
No, that is something you put yourself there.
Sorry Kai, the
On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:15:24 -0400:
Ok, is there a quick dirty way to determine which .pre file (or
local.cf, there are 3 of those too) is actually running the show?
all the files in /etc/mail/spamassassin
Ok, I'll start there.
On 8/14/2007 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:15:24 -0400:
Ok, is there a quick dirty way to determine which .pre file (or local.cf,
there are 3 of those too) is actually running the show?
all the files in /etc/mail/spamassassin
No, that is something
On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 8/14/2007 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:15:24 -0400:
Ok, is there a quick dirty way to determine which .pre file (or
local.cf, there are 3 of those too) is actually running the show?
all the
On 8/14/2007 2:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 8/14/2007 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:15:24 -0400:
Ok, is there a quick dirty way to determine which .pre file (or
local.cf, there are 3 of those too)
On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 8/14/2007 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:15:24 -0400:
Ok, is there a quick dirty way to determine which .pre file (or
local.cf, there are 3 of those too) is actually running the show?
all the
Gene Heskett wrote on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:46:55 -0400:
[18342] dbg: dns: query failed: 3.2.3.saupdates.openprotect.com = NXDOMAIN
[18342] dbg: channel: no updates available, skipping channel
[18342] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with code 1
So, we're back to my subject line,
On 8/14/2007 2:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 8/14/2007 6:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:15:24 -0400:
Ok, is there a quick dirty way to determine which .pre file (or
local.cf, there are 3 of those too)
Gene Heskett wrote:
So what needs to be used in place of saupdates.openprotect.com?
I might add that rulesdujour seems to work, but I've not regularly abused
their site since the DDOS started.
Darryl does a good job of providing all the sare rulesets via sa-update.
All the details are on
At 19:22 12-08-2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
And why not? They've been announced as available, so one would assume a
simple run of sa-update would pull them.
The PDFInfo plugin is available from SARE. There is a
non-spamassassin.org channel to get the updates using
sa-update. Note that
On Monday 13 August 2007, SM wrote:
At 19:22 12-08-2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
And why not? They've been announced as available, so one would assume a
simple run of sa-update would pull them.
The PDFInfo plugin is available from SARE. There is a
non-spamassassin.org channel to get the updates
Gene Heskett wrote on Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:24:15 -0400:
All copies of the same exact file, by hand. Should I delete the one
in /var/lib/perl5?
You can and should delete all that are not in use. The ones loaded with a
.pre file is in use, the others aren't.
[28645] dbg: rules: meta test
Hi Gene,
At 07:24 13-08-2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
Ok, but the above spamassassin check also reports this, near the end of the
report:
[28645] dbg: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined
dependency 'DCC_CHECK'
This meta test depends on the DCC plugin. You can ignore the
warning. The
On Monday 13 August 2007, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote on Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:24:15 -0400:
All copies of the same exact file, by hand. Should I delete the one
in /var/lib/perl5?
You can and should delete all that are not in use. The ones loaded with a
.pre file is in use, the others
17 matches
Mail list logo
