Hi Matt,
Matt Kettler wrote:
Yeah? so? Set up a procmail rule to bypass the call to spamc when the
recipient is the user you don't want scanned.
I'm very intereseted in this, since i have one user that is constantly
throwing my server down due to the amount and size of the mail she receives.
Can
At 11:04 AM 9/29/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Aah, yes, but this is called from a system-wide procmail file.
Yeah? so? Set up a procmail rule to bypass the call to spamc when the
recipient is the user you don't want scanned.
System wide vs per-user calls of procmail does not matter here
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 10:03 AM 9/29/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I want to set up a whitelist_to for my abuse@ address, but the problem is
that it only kicks the score down by six, and when people are forwarding
spam to it, well, the score's still WAY too high.
Is
At 10:03 AM 9/29/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I want to set up a whitelist_to for my abuse@ address, but the problem is
that it only kicks the score down by six, and when people are forwarding
spam to it, well, the score's still WAY too high.
Is there some setting that will just say "d
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:03:59AM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> Is there some setting that will just say "don't even scan it" or
> something?
Try "all_spam_to".
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
double value;/* or your money back! */
short changed; /* so
