Re[3]: What Optional Rules do I really need?

Hello User, Thursday, December 1, 2005, 4:26:43 PM, you wrote: UfSML SARE_FRAUD was suggested but would this be a duplication when UfSML we are running clamd virus scanner on all the mail? I don't think so. The fraud rules file is aimed at phishing emails. If clamd catches your phishing

RE: Re[3]: What Optional Rules do I really need?

From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] UfSML SARE_FRAUD was suggested but would this be a duplication when UfSML we are running clamd virus scanner on all the mail? I don't think so. The fraud rules file is aimed at phishing emails. If clamd catches your phishing emails, then

Re[3]: What Optional Rules do I really need?

Yes, clamd does a good job on phishing emails. Thanks, Ken Rea On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Robert Menschel wrote: Hello User, Thursday, December 1, 2005, 4:26:43 PM, you wrote: UfSML SARE_FRAUD was suggested but would this be a duplication when UfSML we are running clamd virus scanner on all