Hi Chris,
Am 2008-06-10 13:43:07, schrieb Chris Hoogendyk:
hmm. Didn't notice upbrade rather than upgrade until I was actually
replying. ;-)
:-) Now I had to look into me German-English dictionary...
Hmmm, maks no snese... brad is a Drahtstift but then a Reverse-
Lookup give me
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hi Chris,
Am 2008-06-10 13:43:07, schrieb Chris Hoogendyk:
hmm. Didn't notice upbrade rather than upgrade until I was actually
replying. ;-)
:-) Now I had to look into me German-English dictionary...
Hmmm, maks no snese... brad is a Drahtstift but then
of the
Mail-Followup-To header field fooled me into thinking the list owners
wanted replies to go to the list. Now I get it. Ha ha.
Joseph Brennan
Columbia University Information Technology
Am 2008-06-09 09:45:05, schrieb Joseph Brennan:
I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply.
Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list?
We do not need it since recent/modern MUAs support Reply-To-List.
It does have a Mail-Followup-To field
it. The presence of the
Mail-Followup-To header field fooled me into thinking the list owners
wanted replies to go to the list. Now I get it. Ha ha.
The list does not add a Mail-Followup-To header. It is the sender who
choses to add one if he doesn't want private copies. some people even
set
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-06-09 09:45:05, schrieb Joseph Brennan:
I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply.
Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list?
We do not need it since recent/modern MUAs support Reply-To-List
Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to someone else):
And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them.
I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply.
Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list?
It does have
Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (to someone else):
And, please, do NOT send me private copies. I do not need nor want them.
I noticed I have to keep editing the To field every time I reply.
Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list?
Reply
Matthias Leisi wrote:
Reply-To considered harmful: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
And still considered harmful:
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html
Yeah, well, Considered Harmful essays are also considered harmful:
Kelson wrote:
Yeah, well, Considered Harmful essays are also considered harmful:
http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html
It was inevitable that the format would be used on itself.
Let's remember that these essays are matters of individual opinion, not
statements of indisputable truth
-to directing replies to the list?
It does have a Mail-Followup-To field, a proposal from 1997 that was not
included in RFC 2822 in 2001, so not surprisingly clients don't know
they should use it. If it was standardized in the last couple of
years I expect someone here to educate me :-)
It's bad
to write my
body than to edit my recipient list.
Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list?
let's get a deal. we don't ask about your mac, and you don't ask about
our header :) is this fair?
don't start this old battle again...
It does have a Mail-Followup-To field
to a sane MUA ...
Why doesn't the list insert a Reply-to directing replies to the list?
... because your MUA should have a List-Reply feature/button/...
It does have a Mail-Followup-To field, a proposal from 1997 that was not
And that is good. Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful was already
mentioned
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:55 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Kelson wrote:
Yeah, well, Considered Harmful essays are also considered harmful:
http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html
It was inevitable that the format would be used on itself.
Of course. People should use more on itself - a lot
14 matches
Mail list logo
