or check http://www.artica.fr that include spamassassin+amavis+end-user mgmt
On 08/07/2010 23:28, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On tor 08 jul 2010 17:54:30 CEST, Sasa wrote
therefore I must use amavisd-new functions for to rescue an spam mail ?
google mailzu-ng
On tor 08 jul 2010 17:54:30 CEST, Sasa wrote
therefore I must use amavisd-new functions for to rescue an spam mail ?
google mailzu-ng
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On 08/07/10 16:44, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 08.07.10 17:11, Sasa wrote:
Hi, when arrived SPAM mail in log file I have, ie:
Jul 8 16:46:24 mail amavis[32426]: (32426-08) SPAM,
-> , Yes, hits=10.22
tag=1 tag2=5 kill=5 tests=AWL=1.163, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17,
DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.00
"Matus UHLAR - fantomas" wrote:
well, this has completely nothing to do with spamassassin.
it's amavis or tyour MTA's issue. Spamassassin is only responsible for
checking if the mail is spam, and here amavis plugs between SA and MTA
only
to call some spamassassin functions.
therefore I must u
On 08.07.10 17:11, Sasa wrote:
> Hi, when arrived SPAM mail in log file I have, ie:
>
> Jul 8 16:46:24 mail amavis[32426]: (32426-08) SPAM,
> -> , Yes, hits=10.22
> tag=1 tag2=5 kill=5 tests=AWL=1.163, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17,
> DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001, HS_INDEX_PARAM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FA
Hi, when arrived SPAM mail in log file I have, ie:
Jul 8 16:46:24 mail amavis[32426]: (32426-08) SPAM,
-> , Yes, hits=10.22
tag=1 tag2=5 kill=5 tests=AWL=1.163, BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17,
DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001, HS_INDEX_PARAM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RAZOR2_CF
