On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 13:56 +, RW wrote:
>
> I was using 3.4.2
>
> > simply appending /alphastring to the
> > bare IP caused it to be recognised by a URI rule. I was a little
> > surprised as I'd been expecting the httpd:// or https:// prefix
> > would
> > be required.
>
A thought: I wonder
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 20:19:15 +
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 18:18 +, RW wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:26:29 +
> > Martin Gregorie wrote:
> >
> >
> > > describe MG_BARE_IP Bare IP in a URI
> > > body __MG_BAI0 /\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}/
> > > uri
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 18:18 +, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:26:29 +
> Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
>
> > describe MG_BARE_IP Bare IP in a URI
> > body __MG_BAI0 /\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}/
> > uri __MG_BAI1 /\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\/\w*/
> > meta
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:53:51 -0500 (CDT)
David B Funk wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > Note that technical computing discussions may validly contain bare
> > IPs, e.g. 127.0.0.1 is never a spam indication since it is the IP of
> > 'localhost' and so its appearance is
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 15:55 +0200, Anders Gustafsson wrote:
Is there such a rule already in 3.3.x? I would ideally want a version
of that that adds to the spam score if it sees a x.x.x.x/unsubscribe
link, possibly translated.
[snip..]
describe
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:26:29 +
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> describe MG_BARE_IP Bare IP in a URI
> body __MG_BAI0 /\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}/
> uri __MG_BAI1 /\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\/\w*/
> meta MG_BARE_IP (__MG_BAI0 || __MG_BAI1)
> scoreMG_BARE_IP 0.01
>
>
Thanks. I hd some issues installing 3.4, libc conflict IIRC so I Installed 3.3,
but I have been planning to upgrade. I guess I will jut download the source
tarball and build it on the system.
FWIW this system is not facing the internet. The MTA deposits incoming main
into a folder where sa
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 15:55 +0200, Anders Gustafsson wrote:
> Is there such a rule already in 3.3.x? I would ideally want a version
> of that that adds to the spam score if it sees a x.x.x.x/unsubscribe
> link, possibly translated.
>
> Asking here as regexps are not really my strong side.
>
On 29 Oct 2018, at 9:55, Anders Gustafsson wrote:
Is there such a rule already in 3.3.x?
Do not run SpamAssassin 3.3.x. It is not safe. There have been multiple
serious security bugs fixed in the 3.4.x series.
However, the rules for 3.3.x and 3.4.x are identical. And yes, the rule
Is there such a rule already in 3.3.x? I would ideally want a version of that
that adds to the spam score if it sees a x.x.x.x/unsubscribe link, possibly
translated.
Asking here as regexps are not really my strong side.
--
Anders Gustafsson
Engineer, CNI, CNE6, ASE
Pedago, The Aaland Islands
10 matches
Mail list logo