Re: Rule for raw HTML

2006-11-10 Thread John D. Hardin
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Steve Lake wrote: End users want eye candy and the ooo's and hhh's treatment when reading mail. To them email isn't a tool, but an entertainment form. Snarf! -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic

Re: Rule for raw HTML

2006-11-10 Thread Steve Lake
At 01:34 PM 11/10/2006 +0100, Charlie Clark wrote: ha, as if it were even a rant! Anything that is multipart but has no text/plain should be rejected by the MTA so that the ISP's get round to fixing the problem. Flood an SMTP with bounces because of that and all of a sudden the problem gets

Re: Rule for raw HTML

2006-11-09 Thread Steve Lake
At 07:05 PM 11/8/2006 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: My manufacturing company is very picky about accepting physical inputs from vendors. We should be equally picky about what we accept from them in email. Oh, I'll fully agree with that. The problem isn't doing it the right way. The

Rule for raw HTML

2006-11-08 Thread Ron
A few spams have slipped by that contain HTML that is appearing as normal text (due to them not getting something right). For example: and you may haveBRcontempt seemed abundantly increasing with the length of his second speech, and at the end of it heBRand the mortification of kitty Is there

Re: Rule for raw HTML

2006-11-08 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 09.11.2006 um 01:18 schrieb Ron: A few spams have slipped by that contain HTML that is appearing as normal text (due to them not getting something right). For example: and you may haveBRcontempt seemed abundantly increasing with the length of his second speech, and at the end of it

Re: Rule for raw HTML

2006-11-08 Thread hamann . w
A few spams have slipped by that contain HTML that is appearing as normal text (due to them not getting something right). For example: and you may haveBRcontempt seemed abundantly increasing with the length of his second speech, and at the end of it heBRand the mortification of kitty

Re: Rule for raw HTML

2006-11-08 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Thursday, November 09, 2006 1:21 AM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really dislike html in mails - whether in the right mime part or not - but I have seen many legitimate mails that get mime stuff wrong. Of course these are not normal mail clients, but server generated mails like order

RE: Rule for raw HTML

2006-11-08 Thread Michael Scheidell
-Original Message- From: Kenneth Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:06 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Rule for raw HTML My manufacturing company is very picky about accepting physical inputs from vendors. We should