From large providers i sometimes recieve messages through encrypted
smtp, the header looks smth like this (qmail):
... with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; ...
Would it be a good idea to give a minimal negative score on this -0.1 or
-0.2 if this happens on the last hop? - It proves that the
From large providers i sometimes recieve messages through encrypted
smtp, the header looks smth like this (qmail):
... with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; ...
Would it be a good idea to give a minimal negative score on this -0.1 or
-0.2 if this happens on the last hop? - It proves
On 7/13/2007 11:04 AM, arni wrote:
From large providers i sometimes recieve messages through encrypted
smtp, the header looks smth like this (qmail):
... with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; ...
Would it be a good idea to give a minimal negative score on this -0.1 or
-0.2
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 13.07.07 17:04, arni wrote:
From large providers i sometimes recieve messages through encrypted
smtp, the header looks smth like this (qmail):
... with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; ...
Would it be a good idea to give a minimal negative score on this
Most likely, Johnny Spammer monitoring this list will just add a FAKE
header to take advantage of such a rule.
Matt Kettler wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 13.07.07 17:04, arni wrote:
From large providers i sometimes recieve messages through encrypted
smtp, the header
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Dave Koontz wrote:
Most likely, Johnny Spammer monitoring this list will just add a
FAKE header to take advantage of such a rule.
You would only check it in the header that your MTA added.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL
1) that won't help any. You'd want to check this against headers
generated by trusted relays.
2) Even if he does, who cares. At such a small score it's unlikely to
help the spammer any. However, email which is marginally above the
autolearn threshold will be helped. (Personally, I get a
On 7/13/2007 11:04 AM, arni wrote:
From large providers i sometimes recieve messages through encrypted
smtp, the header looks smth like this (qmail):
... with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; ...
Would it be a good idea to give a minimal negative score on this -0.1 or
-0.2 if this
From large providers i sometimes recieve messages through encrypted
smtp, the header looks smth like this (qmail):
... with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; ...
Would it be a good idea to give a minimal negative score on this -0.1 or
-0.2 if this happens on the last hop? - It proves that the
On 13.07.07 17:04, arni wrote:
From large providers i sometimes recieve messages through encrypted
smtp, the header looks smth like this (qmail):
... with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; ...
Would it be a good idea to give a minimal negative score on this -0.1 or
-0.2 if this happens on
10 matches
Mail list logo
