mouss wrote:
Chris Purves a écrit :
[snip]
What spamc calls EnvelopeFrom is the top header of the message:
Return-path:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am guessing that exim calls spamc before it adds this header so that
spamc has less information to work with than when running the tests.
I'm sorry fo
Chris Purves a écrit :
[snip]
>
> What spamc calls EnvelopeFrom is the top header of the message:
>
> Return-path:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I am guessing that exim calls spamc before it adds this header so that
> spamc has less information to work with than when running the tests.
>
> I'm sorr
Chris Purves wrote:
Chris Purves wrote:
I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
[5959] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28)
[5959] dbg: spf: cannot get HELO, cannot use SPF
[5959] d
Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Chris Purves wrote:
hI,
I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
[5959] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28)
[5959] dbg: spf: cannot g
jdow wrote:
From: "Chris Purves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
* -1.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
But if I run the same message from a user account with spamassassin
-t <
... I get:
-100 USER_IN_WHITELIST
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Chris Purves wrote:
hI,
> I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
> SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
>
> [5959] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28)
> [5959] dbg: spf: cannot get HELO, cannot use
From: "Chris Purves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
* -1.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
But if I run the same message from a user account with spamassassin -t <
... I get:
-100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address
On Sat, February 25, 2006 4:18 pm, jdow said:
> From: "Chris Purves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Chris Purves wrote:
>>> I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
>>> SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
>>>
>>> [5959] dbg: spf: checking
Yes I am sure I see the -100 score effect, here is an example from this
message posted to the list:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-107.0 required=5.0
tests=1.6:AWL;
version=3.1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 68.122.243.210
Note that it is mimedefang and not spamassassin that is wr
Barton L. Phillips wrote:
> This is a little off this post, but why don't I ever see
> USER_IN_WHITELIST in my emails. I see the -100's affect in my
> X-Spam-Status but I don't see the rule. I am running SpamAssassin via
> mimedefang. Could that have something to do with it, or is there a
> configu
This is a little off this post, but why don't I ever see
USER_IN_WHITELIST in my emails. I see the -100's affect in my
X-Spam-Status but I don't see the rule. I am running SpamAssassin via
mimedefang. Could that have something to do with it, or is there a
configuration option I have missed?
C
From: "Chris Purves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Chris Purves wrote:
I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
[5959] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28)
[5959] dbg: spf: cannot get HELO, ca
Chris Purves wrote:
I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
[5959] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28)
[5959] dbg: spf: cannot get HELO, cannot use SPF
[5959] dbg: spf: checking Enve
I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
[5959] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28)
[5959] dbg: spf: cannot get HELO, cannot use SPF
[5959] dbg: spf: checking EnvelopeFrom (helo=, ip=66
14 matches
Mail list logo
