On Mon, 15 May 2006, John Rudd wrote:
> Technically, that doesn't make it a standard. That means it's on the track to
> becoming a standard.
It doesn't even mean that. There are many RFCs which are not standards-
track, including this one which is "experimental". Note that all the MARID
RFCs haa
On May 15, 2006, at 12:52 AM, Michael Monnerie wrote:
http://new.openspf.org/News/SPFv1_is_RFC_4408
Technically, that doesn't make it a standard. That means it's on the
track to becoming a standard. It's not a standard until it's STD-4408,
IIRC.
Still, nice to see it moving forward. Se
http://new.openspf.org/News/SPFv1_is_RFC_4408
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660/4156531 .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key: "lynx -source http://zmi.at/zmi3.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: 44A3 C1EC B71E C71A B4C
