Re: SPF should always hit? SOLVED

2016-07-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 11.07.2016 um 21:02 schrieb David B Funk: On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Reindl Harald wrote: SA has also a weakness or design mistake here "envelope_sender_header X-Local-Envelope-From" while that header comes from postfix with customized configuration because we use it in own rules has no fallback

Re: SPF should always hit? SOLVED

2016-07-11 Thread David B Funk
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 11.07.2016 um 19:30 schrieb RW: [snip..] It sounds like SA is not able to parse the envelope sender out of the headers. See the description for envelope_sender_header in man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf SA has also a weakness or design mistake here

Re: SPF should always hit? SOLVED

2016-07-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 11.07.2016 um 19:30 schrieb RW: On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:49:04 -0400 Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: I finally was able to get SPF checks to be more reliable by making sure Postfix SPF policies were in place. Here is a good read https://github.com/mail-in-a-box/mailinabox/issues/698 Excerpt:

Re: SPF should always hit? SOLVED

2016-07-11 Thread RW
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:49:04 -0400 Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > I finally was able to get SPF checks to be more reliable by making > sure Postfix SPF policies were in place. Here is a good read > > https://github.com/mail-in-a-box/mailinabox/issues/698 > Excerpt: It's worth noting that lack o

Re: SPF should always hit? SOLVED

2016-07-11 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: Joe Quinn wrote: On 6/9/2016 11:23 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: Excuse me if this is too lame a question, but I have the SPF plugin enabled and it hits a lot. Should SPF_ something hit on every message if the domain has an SPF record in DNS? Furthermore, a message fo

Re: SPF should always hit?

2016-06-09 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
Joe Quinn wrote: On 6/9/2016 11:23 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: Excuse me if this is too lame a question, but I have the SPF plugin enabled and it hits a lot. Should SPF_ something hit on every message if the domain has an SPF record in DNS? Furthermore, a message found as Google phishing did

Re: SPF should always hit?

2016-06-09 Thread Joe Quinn
On 6/9/2016 11:23 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: Excuse me if this is too lame a question, but I have the SPF plugin enabled and it hits a lot. Should SPF_ something hit on every message if the domain has an SPF record in DNS? Furthermore, a message found as Google phishing did not get a hit on

Re: SPF should always hit?

2016-06-09 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.06.2016 um 17:23 schrieb Robert Fitzpatrick: Excuse me if this is too lame a question, but I have the SPF plugin enabled and it hits a lot. Should SPF_ something hit on every message if the domain has an SPF record in DNS? and if it's SPF_NONE Furthermore, a message found as Google ph

SPF should always hit?

2016-06-09 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
Excuse me if this is too lame a question, but I have the SPF plugin enabled and it hits a lot. Should SPF_ something hit on every message if the domain has an SPF record in DNS? Furthermore, a message found as Google phishing did not get a hit on a email address where the domain has SPF setup.