Am 11.07.2016 um 21:02 schrieb David B Funk:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
SA has also a weakness or design mistake here
"envelope_sender_header X-Local-Envelope-From" while that header comes
from postfix with customized configuration because we use it in own
rules has no fallback
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.07.2016 um 19:30 schrieb RW:
[snip..]
It sounds like SA is not able to parse the envelope sender out of the
headers.
See the description for envelope_sender_header in
man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
SA has also a weakness or design mistake here
Am 11.07.2016 um 19:30 schrieb RW:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:49:04 -0400
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
I finally was able to get SPF checks to be more reliable by making
sure Postfix SPF policies were in place. Here is a good read
https://github.com/mail-in-a-box/mailinabox/issues/698
Excerpt:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:49:04 -0400
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I finally was able to get SPF checks to be more reliable by making
> sure Postfix SPF policies were in place. Here is a good read
>
> https://github.com/mail-in-a-box/mailinabox/issues/698
> Excerpt: It's worth noting that lack o
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
Joe Quinn wrote:
On 6/9/2016 11:23 AM, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
Excuse me if this is too lame a question, but I have the SPF plugin
enabled and it hits a lot. Should SPF_ something hit on every message
if the domain has an SPF record in DNS?
Furthermore, a message fo
