Re: SURBL scored stronger than normal on the apache servers?

2006-12-15 Thread Matt Kettler
Jeff Chan wrote: > The test points were changed from returning a value of 127.0.0.2 > to 127.0.0.126 as of about a year ago. I neglected to announce > the change, though it was mentioned on the SURBL discussion list. > Announcing now. > > 127.0.0.126 represents all ones for the bits of all existin

Re: SURBL scored stronger than normal on the apache servers?

2006-12-15 Thread Jeff Chan
On Thursday, December 14, 2006, 5:03:33 PM, Matt Kettler wrote: > email containing the surbl permanent test point, and no spam quotes. > The test-point URL used to only be listed in SC, although tests at > uribl.com and rulesemporium.com both just report it as listed as a "test > point" and don't

SURBL scored stronger than normal on the apache servers?

2006-12-14 Thread Matt Kettler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields: > > Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:37:35 -0500 > From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: installing URIDNSBL > > Your m