On Sun, July 26, 2009 05:07, snowweb wrote:
I can't understand what is going on here! How can it get a score like that?
The message contained just an image and a link.
add
score whitelist_from 0.1
in user_prefs or local.cf
restart spamd
--
xpoint
On Sun, July 26, 2009 14:18, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, July 26, 2009 05:07, snowweb wrote:
I can't understand what is going on here! How can it get a score like that?
The message contained just an image and a link.
add
score whitelist_from 0.1
ups USER_IN_WHITELIST not whitelist_from
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, July 26, 2009 05:07, snowweb wrote:
I can't understand what is going on here! How can it get a score like that?
The message contained just an image and a link.
add
score whitelist_from 0.1
in user_prefs or local.cf
restart spamd
Um, that's not
On Sun, July 26, 2009 14:31, Matt Kettler wrote:
Um, that's not going to do anything except generate errors Benny.
yes, its early in the morning here local time atleast for me, and i did not
think what i writed above, but i discowered the error
later, imho whitelist_from should be removed from
contained just an image and a link.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Score--71-for-VERY-spammy-message%21-tp24663641p24663641.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
This is the result,
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-71.4 required=4.7 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,MISSING_DATE,MISSING_MID,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_PBL,
On Jul 25, 2009, at 9:07 PM, snowweb wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-71.4 required=4.7 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20
,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3,
MIME_HTML_ONLY
,MISSING_DATE,MISSING_MID,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_PBL,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
-for-VERY-spammy-message%21-tp24663641p24663739.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
snowweb wrote:
USER_IN_WHITELIST
That probably has something to do with it. And make sure you haven't
whitelisted your own user because it is common for spammers to put the
recipient's address in there as the from address, knowing that some
portion of administrators will have whitelisted their
FROM e-mail address.
--
Rob McEwen
http://dnsbl.invaluement.com/
r...@invaluement.com
+1 (478) 475-9032
Eternally grateful. Thanks guys.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Score--71-for-VERY-spammy-message%21-tp24663641p24663895.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users
snowweb wrote:
Terry Carmen wrote:
This is the result,
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-71.4 required=4.7 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3,
11 matches
Mail list logo
