On Sat, 24 Apr 2021, Steve Dondley wrote:
And if you want to test your rules against a corpus rather than
testing against a few one-off spamples, then look into setting up a
local masscheck instance. You don't need to upload the results to SA,
but it will give you a good overview of how a rul
And if you want to test your rules against a corpus rather than
testing against a few one-off spamples, then look into setting up a
local masscheck instance. You don't need to upload the results to SA,
but it will give you a good overview of how a rule behaves against
multiple messages.
I'm
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021, Steve Dondley wrote:
On 2021-04-23 05:41 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 16:28 -0400, Steve Dondley wrote:
I'm experimenting with writing a library of my own SA rules and
scores.
Treat this like any other code development project: use a rule
development
On 2021-04-23 05:41 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 16:28 -0400, Steve Dondley wrote:
I'm experimenting with writing a library of my own SA rules and
scores.
I do this on a separate computer, which has Spamassassin installed but
not linked into anything else. It also has a cop
On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 16:28 -0400, Steve Dondley wrote:
> I'm experimenting with writing a library of my own SA rules and
> scores.
>
I do this on a separate computer, which has Spamassassin installed but
not linked into anything else. It also has a copy of all the live SA
configuration files. Alon
I'm experimenting with writing a library of my own SA rules and scores.
I'd like to be sure that the rules I write don't turn ham into spam and
vice versa. I figured the best way to do this would be to run SA against
an existing collection of ham and spam to make sure emails are still
scored ac
