On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:24:25PM -0400, Steve Lake wrote:
>
> >> Why does it have to be in the ports tree? Does the CPAN version
> >> not run on FreeBSD?
> >
> >Just for consistency's sake. The ports system sometimes gets confused if
> >you have a mix of ports and cpan installed packages.
>
>
> Why does it have to be in the ports tree? Does the CPAN version
> not run on FreeBSD?
Just for consistency's sake. The ports system sometimes gets confused if
you have a mix of ports and cpan installed packages.
Exactly, that's why I prefer to do everything via ports. For one,
it
On 2006-10-16, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 15 October 2006 19:08, John Thompson wrote:
>
>> If you have 3.1.5 working well I wouldn't bother. Besides, 3.1.7 is out
>> already to address some 3.1.6 "oops" issues, but it hasn't made it into
>> the FreeBSD ports tree yet.
* On 15/10/06 21:11 -0800, John Andersen wrote:
| On Sunday 15 October 2006 19:08, John Thompson wrote:
|
| > If you have 3.1.5 working well I wouldn't bother. Besides, 3.1.7 is out
| > already to address some 3.1.6 "oops" issues, but it hasn't made it into
| > the FreeBSD ports tree yet.
|
| Wh
On Sunday 15 October 2006 19:08, John Thompson wrote:
> If you have 3.1.5 working well I wouldn't bother. Besides, 3.1.7 is out
> already to address some 3.1.6 "oops" issues, but it hasn't made it into
> the FreeBSD ports tree yet.
Why does it have to be in the ports tree? Does the CPAN version
On 2006-10-15, Steve Lake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just looked over the bug fix list for 3.1.6 and it doesn't seem
> like anything *major* that would suggest that I should make the leap. I'm
> right now running 3.1.5 on my box. Is there other improvements, such as
> rules and the
Ok, well I only see 3.1.6 on the site. Not unless I'm looking in
the wrong place.
At 11:26 PM 10/14/2006 -0700, jdow wrote:
3.1.7. Skip 6.
{^_^}
- Original Message - From: "Steve Lake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 20:14
Subject
3.1.7. Skip 6.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Lake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 20:14
Subject: Should I upgrade to 3.1.6?
Just looked over the bug fix list for 3.1.6 and it doesn't seem
like anything *major* that
>
> Just looked over the bug fix list for 3.1.6 and it doesn't seem
> like anything *major* that would suggest that I should make the leap. I'm
> right now running 3.1.5 on my box. Is there other improvements, such as
> rules and the like, that would make this a preferable upgrade? Or
Just looked over the bug fix list for 3.1.6 and it doesn't seem
like anything *major* that would suggest that I should make the leap. I'm
right now running 3.1.5 on my box. Is there other improvements, such as
rules and the like, that would make this a preferable upgrade? Or should I
10 matches
Mail list logo
