Ned Slider wrote:
Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
For those using RHEL5/CentOS5 and wanting to update,
We use Scientific Linux 5 which is a re-compiled RHEL 5
*erm*, actually it's Scientific Linux 4 (RHEL 4), the rest is true tho ;)
- with Dag's
3.56 rpm installed. I installed
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 18:22 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 11:16:03PM +0100, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
> > Could you describe more elaborately how you did that?
>
> You may wish to take a look at cpan2rpm, fwiw.
deprecated. look at cpan2dist if you are running perl 5.10
-
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 11:16:03PM +0100, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
> Could you describe more elaborately how you did that?
You may wish to take a look at cpan2rpm, fwiw.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"... Either this man is suffering from serious brain damage, or the new
vacuum cleaner's arrived
Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. it indeed works (HTML::Parser 3.59).
For those using RHEL5/CentOS5 and wanting to update,
We use Scientific Linux 5 which is a re-compiled RHEL 5 - with Dag's
3.56 rpm installed. I installed HTML::Parser 3.59 there from CPA
Ned Slider wrote:
Thanks for the heads up. it indeed works (HTML::Parser 3.59).
For those using RHEL5/CentOS5 and wanting to update,
We use Scientific Linux 5 which is a re-compiled RHEL 5 - with Dag's
3.56 rpm installed. I installed HTML::Parser 3.59 there from CPAN (with
local make) wit
mouss wrote:
Bill Landry a écrit :
This issue has been resolved. Thanks to Justin Mason and Gisle Aas
(HTML::Parser guy) for finding the fix. The resolution is to update
HTML::Parser to the latest version and then restart SA.
Thanks for the heads up. it indeed works (HTML::Parser 3.59).
Bill Landry a écrit :
> This issue has been resolved. Thanks to Justin Mason and Gisle Aas
> (HTML::Parser guy) for finding the fix. The resolution is to update
> HTML::Parser to the latest version and then restart SA.
>
Thanks for the heads up. it indeed works (HTML::Parser 3.59).
Bill Landry wrote:
> mouss wrote:
>> Bill Landry wrote:
>>> I've posted a short pharma spam message to:
>>>
>>> http://www.inetmsg.com/spam.txt
>>>
>>> and debug output to:
>>>
>>> http://www.inetmsg.com/sa-debug.txt
>>>
>>> It displays a single URI linked line in an e-mail client that only
>>> dis
mouss wrote:
> Bill Landry wrote:
>> I've posted a short pharma spam message to:
>>
>> http://www.inetmsg.com/spam.txt
>>
>> and debug output to:
>>
>> http://www.inetmsg.com/sa-debug.txt
>>
>> It displays a single URI linked line in an e-mail client that only
>> displays: "Please visit our shop."
Bill Landry wrote:
I've posted a short pharma spam message to:
http://www.inetmsg.com/spam.txt
and debug output to:
http://www.inetmsg.com/sa-debug.txt
It displays a single URI linked line in an e-mail client that only
displays: "Please visit our shop." There seems to be something about
the
I've posted a short pharma spam message to:
http://www.inetmsg.com/spam.txt
and debug output to:
http://www.inetmsg.com/sa-debug.txt
It displays a single URI linked line in an e-mail client that only
displays: "Please visit our shop." There seems to be something about
the URI in the message th
11 matches
Mail list logo