Example spam at: http://www.pbp.net/~jnichols/spam3.txt
I've been getting quite a lot of spam that's coming *directly* from
Google, using Google servers and referencing blogspot.com (also a
Google property) URLs. I've been submitting them to URIBL but
naturally, they're constantly changing.
Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Example spam at: http://www.pbp.net/~jnichols/spam3.txt
>
> I've been getting quite a lot of spam that's coming *directly* from Google,
> using Google servers and referencing blogspot.com (also a Google property)
> URLs. I've been submitting them to
Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've been getting quite a lot of spam that's coming *directly* from Google,
>> using Google servers and referencing blogspot.com (also a Google property)
>> URLs. I've been submitting them to URIBL but naturally, they're constan
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I've been getting quite a lot of spam that's coming *directly* from
> >> Google,
> >> using Google servers and referencing blogspot.com (also a Google property)
> >> URLs. I've been submitting them to URIBL but naturally,
Am 2008-05-25 23:44:33, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
> I have tried contacting postmaster@ but their auto-response is uselessly
> disingenuous. In it, they insist that spam is never sent from Google
> servers, and only from "miscreants" who forge @gmail.com addresses.
END OF RE
I have checked the Received: headers several times and the messages are
coming from or . Maybe they should be listet in
.
We have 200 complaints a day about spam that really comes from gmail.
It's the biggest source of spam that gets through. Obviously it's also
a very big source of l
Joseph Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have checked the Received: headers several times and the messages are
>> coming from or . Maybe they should be listet in
>> .
>
> We have 200 complaints a day about spam that really comes from gmail.
> It's the biggest sou
Joseph Brennan wrote:
> Just a few months ago we did not get much spam at all from gmail.
> Something changed.
One change seems to be that Google's captcha has been broken.
http://www.google.com/search?q=google+captcha+broken
Bob
> Joseph Brennan wrote:
> > Just a few months ago we did not get much spam at all from gmail.
> > Something changed.
On 28.05.08 20:24, Bob Proulx wrote:
> One change seems to be that Google's captcha has been broken.
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=google+captcha+broken
don't they block fo
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I think it's more about spammers, law and security of (mostly) home
> computers. In my employer's company we also notice spam increase from our
> network etc. and google as free mail provider is also just the victim.
Victims? IMNTBHO, if a company is going to provid
10 matches
Mail list logo
