Quoting Raymond Dijkxhoorn :
Hi!
Can't you do zone transfers? Then you can do away with the
subscriber_key thing and have DNS resolve locally for spamhaus.org and
not have to query their DNS servers.
They sell datafeed and they sell queries, we bought queries. I do not
believe they would th
The way it works is you rsync the zone on a scheule, and rbldnsd serves
it. We subscribed to it for a while and liked it, just wished they had
some different pricing tiers. We setup a virtual machine to do the
rsyncing/rbldnsd and had our main dns servers (as used by the
resolv.conf on the spam
Hi!
Can't you do zone transfers? Then you can do away with the
subscriber_key thing and have DNS resolve locally for spamhaus.org and
not have to query their DNS servers.
They sell datafeed and they sell queries, we bought queries. I do not
believe they would think kindly on my trying a zone
d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
> Quoting DAve :
>
>> Good morning all,
>>
>> I recently got my employer to pay for spamhaus queries, finally. I need
>> to use a key to access spamhaus now. Not an issue for for me MTA but SA
>> is another problem. When I change the rules to use our key, the key is
>
d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
Can't you do zone transfers? Then you can do away with the
subscriber_key thing and have DNS resolve locally for spamhaus.org and
not have to query their DNS servers.
That's what I do here, but between their recommendations ("use a local
zone to prevent accidenta
Quoting DAve :
Good morning all,
I recently got my employer to pay for spamhaus queries, finally. I need
to use a key to access spamhaus now. Not an issue for for me MTA but SA
is another problem. When I change the rules to use our key, the key is
displayed in the spam report.
When I add this
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:27:44 -0500
DAve wrote:
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > On 1/7/10 11:25 AM, DAve wrote:
> >> Good morning all,
> >>
> >> I can't be printing our key in the emails, what is a sysadmin to
> >> do?
> >>
> >>
> > you could (maybe) use meta rules?
> > zero out (disable) origi
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> On 1/7/10 11:25 AM, DAve wrote:
>> Good morning all,
>>
>> I can't be printing our key in the emails, what is a sysadmin to do?
>>
>>
> you could (maybe) use meta rules?
> zero out (disable) originals, use meta rules, keep meta names to match
> original rule names in
I get this is my spam reporting,
0.9 RCVD_IN_PBLRBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[4.23.231.50 listed in .zen.dq.spamhaus.net]
I can't be printing our key in the emails, what is a sysadmin to do?
Some rules don't print out the 'listed in' detail (although the
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> When I add this to override the URL SA uses,
>> header RCVD_IN_PBL eval:check_rbl('pbl-lastexternal',
>> '.zen.dq.spamhaus.net.', '127.0.0.1[01]')
>>
>> I get this is my spam reporting,
>> 0.9 RCVD_IN_PBLRBL: Received via a relay in
On 1/7/10 11:25 AM, DAve wrote:
Good morning all,
I can't be printing our key in the emails, what is a sysadmin to do?
you could (maybe) use meta rules?
zero out (disable) originals, use meta rules, keep meta names to match
original rule names in case of other meta rules that depend on it
Hi!
When I add this to override the URL SA uses,
header RCVD_IN_PBL eval:check_rbl('pbl-lastexternal',
'.zen.dq.spamhaus.net.', '127.0.0.1[01]')
I get this is my spam reporting,
0.9 RCVD_IN_PBLRBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[4.23.231.50 listed in .
Good morning all,
I recently got my employer to pay for spamhaus queries, finally. I need
to use a key to access spamhaus now. Not an issue for for me MTA but SA
is another problem. When I change the rules to use our key, the key is
displayed in the spam report.
When I add this to override the UR
13 matches
Mail list logo
