Re: Stats (was: The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st.)

2009-05-26 Thread Justin Mason
btw guys, note that hit-frequencies can also produce rule-overlap reports using the -o switch --j. On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 00:57, Mandy messaging.director...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Henrik K h...@hege.li wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:28:55PM +0200, Karsten

Re: Stats (was: The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st.)

2009-05-25 Thread Mandy
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Henrik K h...@hege.li wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:28:55PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st. [snip] Thanks. And this is just a small scale test. If we used more domains, feeds, and submissions,

Re: Stats (was: The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st.)

2009-05-23 Thread Chris
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 07:06 +0300, Henrik K wrote: Thanks. And this is just a small scale test. If we used more domains, feeds, and submissions, it could be even nicer. ;-) Keep the reports coming in. It would be nice to also know how much of spam are generally from freemails, so

Re: Stats (was: The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st.)

2009-05-23 Thread Larry Nedry
On 5/22/09 at 9:28 PM +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: An interesting observation is, that the hitrate (in percent) in spam scoring 15 is an order of magnitude higher than with high-scoring [1] spam. This is rare to find... My EMAILBL_TEST_LEM hitrate leans heavily toward the other end of the

Re: Stats (was: The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st.)

2009-05-23 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 11:26 -0500, Larry Nedry wrote: On 5/22/09 at 9:28 PM +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: An interesting observation is, that the hitrate (in percent) in spam scoring 15 is an order of magnitude higher than with high-scoring [1] spam. This is rare to find... My

Re: Stats (was: The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st.)

2009-05-23 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
Sorry, quoting self. An interesting observation is, that the hitrate (in percent) in spam scoring 15 is an order of magnitude higher than with high-scoring [1] spam. This is rare to find... That's limited to EmailBL hits, so the total of these hits equal 100%. For me that would have

Stats (was: The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st.)

2009-05-22 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st. As promised, here are some results from me, now that I got some half- decent spam throughput. Not an ISP, not a company. Have been running the original cf for 5 days, then updated. Since then another 5 days passed. 8.7% hits in

Re: Stats (was: The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st.)

2009-05-22 Thread Henrik K
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:28:55PM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: The EmailBL test zone period has been extended to July 1st. As promised, here are some results from me, now that I got some half- decent spam throughput. Not an ISP, not a company. Have been running the original cf for 5